IBM Watson Speech to Text vs. POEditor

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Watson Speech to Text
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Speech to Text supports conversion of audio and voice recordings to text in applications.N/A
POEditor
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
POEditor is an online localization management platform, designed to help localization teams increase productivity through collaboration and workflow automation. According to the vendor, compared to other localization tools available on the market, POEditor has a simple, yet versatile, interface for translating software strings, suitable both for professional and amateur translators. At POEditor, you can: translate apps, websites, games, themes and other software…N/A
Pricing
IBM Watson Speech to TextPOEditor
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Watson Speech to TextPOEditor
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—POEditor offers free localization services for Open Source software.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Watson Speech to TextPOEditor
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
IBM Watson Speech to TextPOEditor
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Ginger
Ginger
Score 8.1 out of 10
Ginger
Ginger
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Ginger
Ginger
Score 8.1 out of 10
Ginger
Ginger
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Watson Speech to TextPOEditor
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Watson Speech to TextPOEditor
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
It's best for real time transcription and when the meeting is between the two speakers. Word recognition is accurate. Also it's available for various platforms, like cloud, apps, on-premise, API support. Price wise it's much better than other competitors. However, there can be still improvement in filtering noise and improving word accuracy. Language support can be increased further
Read full review
Code Whale Inc.
No answers on this topic
Pros
IBM
  • Low latency Real time meeting transcription
  • Meeting summary
  • Customer call summary
  • Automatic speech recognition
Read full review
Code Whale Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cons
IBM
  • More language support
  • Recognize multiple speaker when multiple people are there in meeting
  • AI summary can be improved.
  • can be better in filtering the noise
Read full review
Code Whale Inc.
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
It provides more flexible plans as compared to others. These plans are affordable for Small and medium-scale enterprises. They also offer free trial. IBM Watson has wider integration support with the help of API. It has very low latency in real time transcription. Also there is a formatting feature to Transcribe dates, times, currency etc as per the desired format
Read full review
Code Whale Inc.
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Improving productivity
  • Less communication gap
  • better customer services
  • global collaboration made easy.
Read full review
Code Whale Inc.
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

POEditor Screenshots

Screenshot of Dashboard - POEditor localization platformScreenshot of Contributors - POEditor localization platformScreenshot of Project page - POEditor localization platformScreenshot of Language page - POEditor localization platformScreenshot of Project Settings - POEditor localization platform