InRule vs. Lua

With InRule, we are expecting to be able to move business logic out of the developer domain and back into the business domain. Business logic is currently captured in UI (data validation) and middleware layers. These are areas in any application where leveraging InRule's capabilities allow for changes in business logic to be made with little or no IT involvement.

I wouldn't recommend Lua because they were recently acquired by another company and will be shutting down. It was unfortunate that we were only given 2 months notice right after signing up for another 1-year term.

Incentivized

• It is easy to tweak business rule parameters.
• Create new logic with low barriers.

Incentivized

• It is easy to communicate in real-time.
• Easy to set up different groups.

Incentivized

• Needs more debugging capabilities.

• The application for iPad is not optimized.

Incentivized

InRule's Support Portal provides a "one stop shop" for submitting support questions, accessing training information, managing licenses, and getting updates on InRule's roadmap.

They are closing operations, so there's no support to rate

Incentivized

InRule offers a more organized software design, a well-structured framework in design, and is easier for new users to start contributing given documentation. Drools is spreadsheet-based and lacking the capability to do really advanced pseudo-programming.

Incentivized

We chose Lua because of their price point and feature set compared to other tools.

Incentivized

• It is always reliable and efficient.
• Has won customers over.

• It has been great for communication and broadcasts, its a shame that they are closing down.

Incentivized