IP Fabric vs. Progress Chef
IP Fabric vs. Progress Chef
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IP Fabric | N/A | IP Fabric’s Automated Network Assurance Platform helps companies empower their network engineers to discover, verify, and document large scale enterprise networks. IP Fabric automates network infrastructure data collection and provides predefined verifications that highlight inconsistencies, misconfigurations and issues within enterprise networks. | N/A | |
Progress Chef | N/A | Chef IT infrastructure automation suites were developed by Chef Software in Seattle and acquired by Progress Software in September 2020. The Chef Enterprise Automation Stack is an integrated suite of automation technologies presented as a solution for delivering change quickly, repeatedly, and securely over every application's lifecycle. The Chef Effortless Infrastructure Suit is an integrated suite of automation technologies to codify infrastructure, security, and compliance, as well as… | N/A |
| IP Fabric | Progress Chef | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IP Fabric | Progress Chef |
|---|
| IP Fabric | Progress Chef | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Polarion ALM Score 9.8 out of 10 | HashiCorp Terraform Score 8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Polarion ALM Score 9.8 out of 10 | Ansible Score 9.2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Polarion ALM Score 9.8 out of 10 | Ansible Score 9.2 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IP Fabric | Progress Chef | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 8.9 (18 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 7.3 (1 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 9.4 (5 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 7.7 (3 ratings) |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - (0 ratings) | 6.4 (1 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 9.6 (5 ratings) |
| Professional Services | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
| IP Fabric | Progress Chef | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() IP Fabric No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress Software Corporation
|
| Pros | ![]() IP Fabric No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress Software Corporation
|
| Cons | ![]() IP Fabric No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress Software Corporation
|
| Usability | ![]() IP Fabric No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress Software Corporation
|
| Performance | ![]() IP Fabric No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress Software Corporation
|
| Support Rating | ![]() IP Fabric No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress Software Corporation
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() IP Fabric No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress Software Corporation
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | ![]() IP Fabric No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress Software Corporation
|
| Professional Services | ![]() IP Fabric No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress Software Corporation
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() IP Fabric No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress Software Corporation
|
| ScreenShots |



