John the Ripper vs. Veracode

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
John the Ripper
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
John the Ripper is a penetration testing tool used to find and crack weak passwords.N/A
Veracode
Score 9.2 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Veracode is a software security firm that identifies flaws and vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Veracode’s Software Security Platform uses advanced AI algorithms trained on vast datasets of code, for more precise identification and rectification of security flaws.N/A
Pricing
John the RipperVeracode
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
John the RipperVeracode
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDeveloper pricing options available
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
John the RipperVeracode
Best Alternatives
John the RipperVeracode
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.2 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.2 out of 10
Checkmarx
Checkmarx
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
John the RipperVeracode
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.2
(138 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(8 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(27 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(67 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
John the RipperVeracode
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
It is best suited in those environments where complexity is not the key. We've used it fairly extensively in our UNIX to find weak UNIX passwords and in Windows environments too. It's very easy to get hold of as it is essentially Open Source, although a paid version is now available and we are thinking of looking at this proposition in-depth to see if it is viable. We found it easy to install and deploy across our systems. Patching was fairly regular, so we always had the latest version. It holds its own against DES and Blowfish encryption algorithms among many others.
Read full review
Veracode
Veracode is well suited for development applications that can be made more secure right from the beginning. There is an excellent extension in Visual Studio that scans code from the IDE. However, it is less appropriate or incompatible with scanning SOAP or WSDL APIs. It supports only REST APIs.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • Easily finds plantect passwords.
  • Simply detects passwords hashes.
  • Has a fully bespoke cracker that can be modified to users requirements.
  • Excellent for UNIX and Windows usage.
Read full review
Veracode
  • Veracode performs Static Application Security Testing (SAST) very well by finding flaws in the code using entry points so that it tests for everything a user can interact with in the application. This approach is very helpful for avoiding a lot of false positives early on.
  • Veracode performs SCA automatically on every SAST scan, so that we don't have to manually scan the application again for SCA scans.
  • Veracode integrates very well with the ticketing tools, so that it becomes very easy to track every finding and its status within our ticketing tool.
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • It needs to be modified to be able to break SHA 256, 512 and the lastest hashes.
  • Can be slow and wildly against the lastest hashes.
  • Require admin access to set up account.
  • Old and is being superseded by better applications.
Read full review
Veracode
  • Scan results stability: from one scan to another, additional flaws appear whereas code did not change.
  • Entry points selection: hard to be sure selection is optimal, should be automatized or hidden.
  • Branches management: we currently use sandboxes to scan different branches of our software. Would be good to have real branches management.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Veracode
At this time, and we just renewed a month ago, I dont see any products out there overall that can offer what Veracode does. Yes, its not cheap by any means, but for the money its the best application security scanning tool out there.
Read full review
Usability
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Veracode
- Almost no setup required and easy to configure - Very easy to use, intuitive UI with integrated analytics and learning portals. - Seamless to review the results, triage them, generate reports. - Security progression of the product/application is tracked via successive scans. - Privileges/Roles nicely fine grained and tightly controlled to let teams "view" only their products.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Veracode
Veracode has always been up and available to us.
Read full review
Performance
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Veracode
At this point, it runs well and mostly in a timely fashion. Dynamic scans take days but this may be a config issue still to be resolved.
Read full review
Support Rating
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Veracode
Overall, Veracode support is helpful, community support is great, and documentation is available for self-service. Our Customer Success Manager is very helpful and reaches out regularly to see if we need assistance. We have not utilized many of the other resources offered by Veracode, however, in the future we would like to leverage secure coding training for our Development teams.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Veracode
We use it as a SAS service, so really just getting our teams to mold the use of Veracode into their SDLC has been a process of years in the making. It comes down to what your teams are ready and willing to accept and change. Management is key in getting their groups on board with using it regularly. If it doesnt have management backing, your security teams have little to no influence in getting this process off the ground fully.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
'John the Ripper' being open source was free to use, whereas the others had to be paid for. It was very simple to install and runs against many hundreds of hashes and crypts. It is always developing thanks to large communities on GitHub.
Read full review
Veracode
Veracode is slower with scan results however the flaws discovered and sites crawled are almost the same. Rapid7 InsightAppSec only does dynamic scans. Veracode did find more links on a site crawl. Rapid7 InsightAppSec has more out of the box reports than Veracode. Both integration to DevOps tools were striaghtforward.
Read full review
Scalability
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Veracode
It meets our needs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Helped us achieve initial Password Auditor goals and targets.
  • Simple and cheap to deploy, so have saved greatly compared to paid for products.
Read full review
Veracode
  • Veracode's platform has had a very positive impact on our security posture, paving the path towards having coverage monitored automatically on hundreds of internal applications throughout the development lifecycle.
  • Veracode's platform has also had a very positive impact on improving the security knowledge of our development team, providing meaningful feedback as well as training options to reduce mitigation time and help to prevent flaws before they are created.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Veracode Screenshots

Screenshot of the Veracode Platform HomepageScreenshot of Static Analysis ScansScreenshot of Findings Status and History DashboardScreenshot of the Veracode Platform