TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Keras

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AKeras is a Python deep learning libraryN/A

    Trint

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ATrint uses artificial intelligence to power its web-based automated transcription platform. Audio and video files are uploaded to Trint’s online software and then transcribed using automated speech recognition. The Trint Editor is the marriage of a text editor to an audio/video player: the transcribed text is “stitched” to the audio or video file, making it simple to search, verify and edit the machine-generated transcripts. Users can instantly time the length of their soundbites. They can…

    $80

    per month per seat

    Pricing
    KerasTrint
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Starter
    $80
    per month per seat
    Advanced
    $100
    per month per seat
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    KerasTrint
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$15 hour
    Additional Details—Up to a 40% discount for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    KerasTrint
    Small Businesses
    TensorFlow
    Score7.6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    KerasTrint
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.1
    (6 ratings)
    9.5
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    7.7
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    KerasTrint
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    Keras is quite perfect, if the aim is to build the standard Deep Learning model, and materialize it to serve the real business use case, while it is not suitable if the purpose is for research and a lot of non-standard try out and customization are required, in that case either directly goes to low level TensorFlow API or Pytorch
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trint
    It consequently translates sound from all record designs and produces a shareable and editable transcript. The interface of Trint is decent and works really hard in interpreting the content. It can also be used when taking an interview of an individual from a different language background. Here and there the record of certain dialects contains botches which are then rectified by the actual persons.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • One of the reason to use Keras is that it is easy to use. Implementing neural network is very easy in this, with just one line of code we can add one layer in the neural network with all it's configurations.
    • It provides lot of inbuilt thing like cov2d, conv2D, maxPooling layers. So it makes fast development as you don't need to write everything on your own. It comes with lot of data processing libraries in it like one hot encoder which also makes your development easy and fast.
    • It also provides functionality to develop models on mobile device.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trint
    • User friendly interface
    • Value for money
    • Seamless to transcribe from audio
    • Performance is quick give results fast
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • As it is a kind of wrapper library it won't allow you to modify everything of its backend
    • Unlike other deep learning libraries, it lacks a pre-defined trained model to use
    • Errors thrown are not always very useful for debugging. Sometimes it is difficult to know the root cause just with the logs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trint
    • No choice for erasing the records whenever you have utilized them.
    • The API likewise needs a great deal of work to be finished.
    • The limitless provisions are extremely less.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Open Source
    I am giving this rating depending on my experience so far with Keras, I didn't face any issue far. I would like to recommend it to the new developers.
    Read full review
    Trint
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Open Source
    Keras have really good support along with the strong community over the internet. So in case you stuck, It won't so hard to get out from it.
    Read full review
    Trint
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    Keras is good to develop deep learning models. As compared to TensorFlow, it's easy to write code in Keras. You have more power with TensorFlow but also have a high error rate because you have to configure everything by your own. And as compared to MATLAB, I will always prefer Keras as it is easy and powerful as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trint
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • Easy and faster way to develop neural network.
    • It would be much better if it is available in Java.
    • It doesn't allow you to modify the internal things.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trint
    • Save time and money
    • Quick results help us to focus on different work
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Trint Screenshots

    Product screenshot