Keyword Eye vs. Ryte

Great for the ability it provides in peeking into search volumes, but the information is limited. The platform could benefit from some of the features of Uber Suggest and Answer the Public.

Incentivized

Ryte offers APIs to integrate with a database or other APIs. Ryte suits well scenarios where Ryte is a part of a larger ecosystem. As a user, I appreciate the simplicity of the UI. Ryte can be a little bit slow on huge websites with complex architecture. It is better to think of an accurate approach rather than spamming reports.

Incentivized

• Various keyword search volume organization options.
• The ability to save keyword searches.

Incentivized

• Great for managing risks related to SEO
• Helps in optimizing content on the site
• Easy to build up reports

Incentivized

• Integration with other platforms.
• Keyword search optimization options.

Incentivized

• TF*IDF analysis could go more in the way how Seolyze.com is doing it

Really easy to use

No experience in needing support from Keyword Eye.

Incentivized

They are nice and quick.

Quick installation - no IT needed

WooRank is slightly ahead, but the integration with Google Analytics is a real advantage of the solution. The full access to all functionalities in the trail helps to appreciate Ryte. Both UIs are quite the same in terms of designs or user experience.

Incentivized

• Improved ability to create better targeted content.
• Cross analysis of keyword volumes and website analytics.

Incentivized

• It can be hard to justify the costs Vs returns, specially if you have most of the data available via other tools

Incentivized