TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Kibana

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AKibana allows users to visualize Elasticsearch data and navigate the Elastic Stack so you can do anything from tracking query load to understanding the way requests flow through your apps.N/A

    LoadRunner Professional

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AA solution simplifies performance load testing for colocated teams. With project-based capabilities, so teams can quickly identify abnormal application behavior.N/A
    Pricing
    KibanaLoadRunner Professional
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    KibanaLoadRunner Professional
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    KibanaLoadRunner Professional
    Considered Both Products
    Elastic
    No answer on this topic
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    80%
    Implementation went as expected
    4 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    KibanaLoadRunner Professional
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Kibana and OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    Feature
    Kibana
    7.0
    5 Ratings
    14% below category average
    OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    -
    Ratings
    Pixel Perfect reports6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Kibana and OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    Feature
    Kibana
    6.7
    5 Ratings
    16% below category average
    OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    -
    Ratings
    Drill-down analysis8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration6.94 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Kibana and OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    Feature
    Kibana
    6.8
    2 Ratings
    18% below category average
    OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    -
    Ratings
    Publish to Web8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Publish to PDF8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Versioning6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Delivery to Remote Servers6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Kibana and OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    Feature
    Kibana
    6.7
    4 Ratings
    14% below category average
    OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    -
    Ratings
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Load Testing
    Comparison of Load Testing features of Kibana and OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    Feature
    Kibana
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    8.4
    6 Ratings
    1% below category average
    End to end performance management00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Integrated performance data00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Real time monitoring00 Ratings6.15 Ratings
    Automated anomaly detection00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    KibanaLoadRunner Professional
    Small Businesses
    Chartio (discontinued)
    Score7.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Jet Reports
    Score9.5 out of 10
    JMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Looker Studio
    Score8.2 out of 10
    JMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    KibanaLoadRunner Professional
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (5 ratings)
    9.0
    (7 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.7
    (2 ratings)
    3.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    KibanaLoadRunner Professional
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Elastic
    Kibana is indeed a powerful tool and has many use cases especially in environments that rely heavily on real-time log analysis and visualisation. Kibana’s ability to handle large volumes of log data and present it in an accessible, searchable format is invaluable. We use Kibana to monitor security related issues and it proactively alerts our Slack channels about any anomality or issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Micro Focus LoadRunner and its suite of tools, specifically VuGen works wonderfully for us for all web, http/https and web service calls. We've been able to build tests for near any scenario we need with relative ease. As long as we have crafted up requirements for our scenarios / scripts to managed scope, we've had high success working with scripting and data driving. Our main tests are web service calls - typically chained together to form a full scenario with transactions measuring the journey or a similar (measure along the way) journey through a browser. For web services we will use VuGen and browser we've shifted to Tru Client I have had little-to-no experience scripting against a thick client where a ui-driven test would be required. I know its possible but quite costly due to the need to run the actual desktop client to drive tests. We've been fortunate enough to leverage http calls to represent client traffic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Elastic
    • Fast searches with powerful index.
    • Beautiful data visualizations.
    • Real-time observability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • It can simulate multiple users at the same time and help understand the performance.
    • It can generate excellent reports and give insights into application performance.
    • It is a fast tool and does not take time to perform its functions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Elastic
    • Some performance issues with large datasets.
    • Linking to dashboards makes extremely long urls.
    • Lack of reports.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • HP LoadRunner with new patches and releases sometimes makes no longer support older version of various protocols like Citrix, which makes the task time-consuming when using older versions of LoadRunner for some of the cases. So it should support older version as well while upgrading.
    • Configuring HP LoadRunner over the firewall involves lots of configuration and may be troublesome. So, there should be a script (power shell script for Windows or shell script for Linux users) to make it easy to use and with less pain.
    • I would like to see the RunTime Viewer of Vugen in HPLoadRunner based on the browser I selected in the run-time configuration to make it feel more realistic as a real user.
    • Licensing cost is very high when we need to perform a test on application for a specific group of users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Elastic
    Its usability is generally good and it provides teams with a basic to intermediate understanding about data visualization. It is very user-friendly when it comes to creating dashboards. The UI is very good and simple. Its integration with other tools for alerting and reporting is amazing. But its advance features have a learning curve and a first timer needs some time to use the advance features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Elastic
    We did not use the official Kibana support. Documentation was easy enough to follow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Customer service is not that great. It's difficult to get hold of someone if an issue is supposed to be addressed on an urgent basis. No online chat service readily available.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Elastic
    Kibana is free; it was the first and only thing we've tried in this area.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    HP performance center stacks up very well for front end applications. Need more improvements for API performance testing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Elastic
    • Issues that affect checkout experiences for customers are able to be prioritized and solved quickly.
    • We are able to more efficiently use resources due to the automation of reporting alerts. Decreasing employee resources needed.
    • Visualization allows us to quickly share issues and explain to coworkers in order to escalate issues that can cost our bottom line.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • The scripts created with traditional web/http protocol are not robust thus re-scripting is required after most every code drop. Troubleshooting and fixing the issue takes more time therefore in most cases we do re-scripting to keep it simple and save time.
    • In ideal world you would rather spend more time doing testing than scripting in that case mostly you could use an Ajax TruClient protocol. This type of script will only fail when an object in the application is removed or changed completely. This way of scripting will save you more time and helps you maintain the scripts with less re-work effort on a release basis. On the long run you will have a better ROI when you use Ajax TruClient protocol for scripting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots