Kobiton vs. Micro Focus Business Process Testing (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Kobiton
Score 4.6 out of 10
N/A
Kobiton in Atlanta offers a mobile test suite, providing an integration to a wide variety of testing tools and partner services. The solution supports functional and performance testing, as well as scriptless automation of tests.
$75
per month
Micro Focus Business Process Testing (discontinued)
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Business Process Testing (formerly HP BPT) is a functional testing framework acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett Packard Enterprise. The product is no longer available as a standalone product, however similar capabilities are supplied by ALM / Quality Center, and Silk Test, both also from Micro Focus.N/A
Pricing
KobitonMicro Focus Business Process Testing (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
Start Up
$75
per month 500 mins / month
Accelerate
$390
per month 3,000 mins / month
Scale
$9000
per year 7,500 mins / month
Enterprise
Custom
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KobitonMicro Focus Business Process Testing (discontinued)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
KobitonMicro Focus Business Process Testing (discontinued)
Best Alternatives
KobitonMicro Focus Business Process Testing (discontinued)
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
SoapUI Open Source
SoapUI Open Source
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
KobitonMicro Focus Business Process Testing (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
KobitonMicro Focus Business Process Testing (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
Kobiton
When it comes to doing or performing testing on the applications or devices then Kobiton is the best option to go forward with. Kobiton is best for both manual and automation testing. It also comes with great features like appium scripts generation which really useful and less time-consuming and makes it really good to go with.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
You may want to consider this solution if you are already using HP ALM and HP UFT. It's a nice add on and encourages the team to think more on building small component based tests and promote lot of reuse. Also, if your team want business analysts or any non technical people build tests based on the flows, its probably the best solution available now. On the down side, the execution times if you have too many components are not great and on top of that you have to pay extra for the licensing. You can also build such frameworks using more open source solutions like bdd solutions.
Read full review
Pros
Kobiton
No answers on this topic
Discontinued Products
  • Biggest advantage is - you can use the same components created for manual as well as automated testing
  • It has a nice little feature called extended capabilities where you can easily automate tests SAP and oracle type architectures.
  • Easy access library lets you create highly reusable and shareable components and the integrations is not that difficult
Read full review
Cons
Kobiton
No answers on this topic
Discontinued Products
  • If you are using components for automation testing, the time it takes to load a new component is too high and it sucks off the benefit of component based testing.
  • You want to have many components in a test and so a BA can also create automated tests easily but too many components takes too long to executed .
  • It comes with a cost. You can simply build a modular framework even without this framework and probably more efficiently.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Kobiton
No answers on this topic
Discontinued Products
The idea for building a component based modular test framework is great and it would be great add-on to HP tools if the add-on efficiency is made high and the cost is low.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Kobiton
No answers on this topic
Discontinued Products
  • As the tool itself promotes re usability, we were able to cut down development and maintenance costs by good %.
  • More than cost savings, out no technical folks started building automated tests based on user flows very easily.
Read full review
ScreenShots