Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Micro Focus Business Process Testing (BPT)

Micro Focus Business Process Testing (BPT)
Formerly HP Business Process Testing

Overview

What is Micro Focus Business Process Testing (BPT)?

Business Process Testing (formerly HP BPT) is a functional testing framework acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett Packard Enterprise. The product is no longer available as a standalone product, however similar capabilities are supplied by ALM / Quality Center, and…

Read more
Recent Reviews
Read all reviews
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing
Micro Focus Business Process Testing (BPT)

Micro Focus Business Process Testing (BPT)

N/A
Unavailable

What is Micro Focus Business Process Testing (BPT)?

Business Process Testing (formerly HP BPT) is a functional testing framework acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett Packard Enterprise. The product is no longer available as a standalone product, however similar capabilities are supplied by ALM / Quality Center, and Silk Test, both also from Micro…

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting / Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

Alternatives Pricing

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

Free
What is BrowserStack?

BrowserStack is a cloud software-testing platform with 19 global data centers powering over a billion tests a year. BrowserStack's over 50,000 customers include Amazon, PayPal, React JS, and Expedia, who use BrowserStack to test their web & mobile apps.

TestComplete

TestComplete

$2,256
per license
What is TestComplete?

TestComplete is a GUI test automation tool that enables users of all skill levels to test the UI of every desktop, web, and mobile application. TestComplete is best suited for testers, automation engineers, and QA teams in any industry.

Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Micro Focus Business Process Testing (BPT)?

Business Process Testing (formerly HP BPT) is a functional testing framework acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett Packard Enterprise. The product is no longer available as a standalone product, however similar capabilities are supplied by ALM / Quality Center, and Silk Test, both also from Micro Focus.

Micro Focus Business Process Testing (BPT) Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(5)

Reviews

(1-1 of 1)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
March 16, 2018

Promote reusability in testing using HP Business Process Testing

Verified User
Professional in Quality Assurance
Information Technology and Services Company, 10,001+ employees
Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
One department in my organization implemented a test strategy (both manual as well as automated) with the help of HP Business Process. Because this solution is component based, if used and implemented properly, you really will have a modular framework and it can be reused very well.
Pros and Cons
  • Biggest advantage is - you can use the same components created for manual as well as automated testing
  • It has a nice little feature called extended capabilities where you can easily automate tests SAP and oracle type architectures.
  • Easy access library lets you create highly reusable and shareable components and the integrations is not that difficult
  • If you are using components for automation testing, the time it takes to load a new component is too high and it sucks off the benefit of component based testing.
  • You want to have many components in a test and so a BA can also create automated tests easily but too many components takes too long to executed .
  • It comes with a cost. You can simply build a modular framework even without this framework and probably more efficiently.
Likelihood to Recommend
You may want to consider this solution if you are already using HP ALM and HP UFT. It's a nice add on and encourages the team to think more on building small component based tests and promote lot of reuse. Also, if your team want business analysts or any non technical people build tests based on the flows, its probably the best solution available now.

On the down side, the execution times if you have too many components are not great and on top of that you have to pay extra for the licensing. You can also build such frameworks using more open source solutions like bdd solutions.
Return on Investment
  • As the tool itself promotes re usability, we were able to cut down development and maintenance costs by good %.
  • More than cost savings, out no technical folks started building automated tests based on user flows very easily.
Alternatives Considered
The idea for building a component based modular test framework is great and it would be great add-on to HP tools if the add-on efficiency is made high and the cost is low.
Other Software Used
Selenium, HP LoadRunner, JMeter, AWS Elastic Beanstalk, AWS Lambda, Jenkins, IntelliJ IDEA, Eclipse, GitHub, Team Foundation Server, JIRA Software, JIRA Service Desk, VersionOne, CA Agile Central (formerly Rally)
Return to navigation