Kualitee vs. Zephyr Scale

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Kualitee
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Kualitee is an all-in-one test management tool that supports manual and automated testing. With Kualitee, users can replace inefficient workflows and spreadsheets, and create and import test cases, execute test cases, log defects and perform defect management activities with a dedicated module. The dashboard provides insights into a project's health. Re-Usability of Test Cases: With Kualitee, users can save test cases as a template for later use. During regression testing, use…
$0
3 Users
Zephyr Scale
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
TM4j is a test management application for Jira, developed by Jira solutions specialist Adaptavist, acquired and now supported by SmartBear since March 2020.
$4.55
per month per user
Pricing
KualiteeZephyr Scale
Editions & Modules
Community
$0.00
3 Users
Silver
$45.00
10 Users
Gold
$200.00
10 Users
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KualiteeZephyr Scale
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsFor enterprise get in touchFree up to 10 users, $4.55/user/month after that. It gets cheaper as you scale.
More Pricing Information
Features
KualiteeZephyr Scale
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Kualitee
6.5
1 Ratings
21% below category average
Zephyr Scale
7.8
1 Ratings
3% below category average
Centralized test management7.01 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Map tests to user stories6.01 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Test execution reporting7.01 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Defect management6.01 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
KualiteeZephyr Scale
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.2 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.6 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.6 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.6 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
KualiteeZephyr Scale
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
KualiteeZephyr Scale
Likelihood to Recommend
Kualitatem
From a business standpoint, features such as test scenarios, test cases, bug logging, and then graphical representations of every minute detail related to task and projects are very satisfying and productive. We can keep track of literally everything with Kualitee, and our quality is improving. One downside is that we cannot change the visualisations of some graphs. I believe that by giving the user more customisation options, such as filtering out on the basis of days and months, the experience could be greatly improved.
Read full review
SmartBear
Jira and Confluence are widely implemented in organizations of various industries so incorporating Zephyr Scale is a very seamless method of adding scalable testing management. Testing visibility and end to end traceability is possible and integrates in Jira. Developers and engineers are able to take advantage of the built-in reports and statistics and even automate testing. The value is greatly reduced for organizations that do not already implement Jira and Confluence as the native integrated compatibility is much of the value
Read full review
Pros
Kualitatem
  • Import and Export
  • Integration with other tools
  • Regression and Blackbox testing
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Scalable and compatible with Jira & Confluence
  • Improves testing visibility, data analysis, collaboration with reports & gadgets
  • Easy to retrospectively trace testing with change history
Read full review
Cons
Kualitatem
  • Support response time
  • Should have dark mode
  • Response time for API call
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Not as valuable if not already using Jira or Confluence
  • Can be overlooked if the user does not set automation
  • Needs better first time tutorials
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Kualitatem
TestRail is very costly and complex compared to Kualitee
Read full review
SmartBear
Zephyr scale is easier to work with and more seamlessly used because it is natively integrated with Jira and Confluence. TestRail cannot provide the same scalable experience and is rather dated and limited in capability. Developers rather use tools that are compatible with each other, and Zephyr scale offers that
Read full review
Return on Investment
Kualitatem
  • If the terminology ( Test Scenarios, modules, components ) is not used in your workflow, it may take some time to set up properly because you must figure out how these are defined by your own terminology to get the hierarchy correct
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Dozens of added testing capability via integrated gadgets
  • Reduced testing and tracking time
  • Faster and clearer testing operations awareness
Read full review
ScreenShots

Kualitee Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of