Kubernetes vs. Syself

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Kubernetes
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Kubernetes is an open-source container cluster manager.N/A
Syself
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Syself offers a simplified Kubernetes Management Platform, used to build reliable environments with 100% reproducibility in just a few steps, no need for in-house experts. With its roots in open-source, Syself states they maintain projects used by hundreds of organizations, running thousands of servers daily on cloud infrastructure. The Syself Kubernetes Platform manages the entire lifecycle of clusters, from creation to scaling and upgrades. Key features: • Ease of use:…
$299
per month
Pricing
KubernetesSyself
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KubernetesSyself
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
KubernetesSyself
Features
KubernetesSyself
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Kubernetes
9.0
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Syself
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation9.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Orchestration9.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Cluster Management9.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management8.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
KubernetesSyself
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
KubernetesSyself
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(19 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
KubernetesSyself
Likelihood to Recommend
Kubernetes
K8s should be avoided - If your application works well without being converted into microservices-based architecture & fits correctly in a VM, needs less scaling, have a fixed traffic pattern then it is better to keep away from Kubernetes. Otherwise, the operational challenges & technical expertise will add a lot to the OPEX. Also, if you're the one who thinks that containers consume fewer resources as compared to VMs then this is not true. As soon as you convert your application to a microservice-based architecture, a lot of components will add up, shooting your resource consumption even higher than VMs so, please beware. Kubernetes is a good choice - When the application needs quick scaling, is already in microservice-based architecture, has no fixed traffic pattern, most of the employees already have desired skills.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Pros
Kubernetes
  • Complex cluster management can be done with simple commands with strong authentication and authorization schemes
  • Exhaustive documentation and open community smoothens the learning process
  • As a user a few concepts like pod, deployment and service are sufficient to go a long way
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Cons
Kubernetes
  • Local development, Kubernetes does tend to be a bit complicated and unnecessary in environments where all development is done locally.
  • The need for add-ons, Helm is almost required when running Kubernetes. This brings a whole new tool to manage and learn before a developer can really start to use Kubernetes effectively.
  • Finicy configmap schemes. Kubernetes configmaps often have environment breaking hangups. The fail safes surrounding configmaps are sadly lacking.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Kubernetes
The Kubernetes is going to be highly likely renewed as the technologies that will be placed on top of it are long term as of planning. There shouldn't be any last minute changes in the adoption and I do not anticipate sudden change of the core underlying technology. It is just that the slow process of technology adoption that makes it hard to switch to something else.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Usability
Kubernetes
It is an eminently usable platform. However, its popularity is overshadowed by its complexity. To properly leverage the capabilities and possibilities of Kubernetes as a platform, you need to have excellent understanding of your use case, even better understanding of whether you even need Kubernetes, and if yes - be ready to invest in good engineering support for the platform itself
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Kubernetes
Most of the required features for any orchestration tool or framework, which is provided by Kubernetes. After understanding all modules and features of the K8S, it is the best fit for us as compared with others out there.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Kubernetes
  • Because of microservices, Kubernetes makes it easy to find the cost of each application easily.
  • Like every new technology, initially, it took more resources to educate ourselves but over a period of time, I believe it's going to be worth it.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots