TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Lifesize CxEngage

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/ACxEngage is a cloud contact center solution designed to meet users' needs and work in their environment. Unlike monolithic architectures and on-premises solutions, CxEngage is a ‘born-in-the-cloud’ platform to deliver unified visibility across voice, video, and digital channels. CxEngage is designed to just work anywhere, and to be implemented in a few days or weeks.

    $85

    per month per user

    Maestro

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AMaestro is an employee performance and talent mangement software solution offered by Madison.N/A
    Pricing
    Lifesize CxEngageMaestro
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Lifesize CxEngageMaestro
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Lifesize CxEngageMaestro
    Contact Center Software
    Comparison of Contact Center Software features of Lifesize CxEngage and Maestro
    Feature
    Lifesize CxEngage
    6.9
    2 Ratings
    20% below category average
    Maestro
    -
    Ratings
    Agent dashboard7.31 Ratings00 Ratings
    Outbound response7.31 Ratings00 Ratings
    Call forwarding6.41 Ratings00 Ratings
    Interactive voice response7.31 Ratings00 Ratings
    REST APIs6.41 Ratings00 Ratings
    Call tracking7.72 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multichannel integration6.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    CRM software integration6.41 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workforce Optimization (WFO)
    Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of Lifesize CxEngage and Maestro
    Feature
    Lifesize CxEngage
    7.0
    2 Ratings
    17% below category average
    Maestro
    -
    Ratings
    Inbound call routing7.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Recording8.62 Ratings00 Ratings
    Call analytics6.82 Ratings00 Ratings
    Historical reporting5.92 Ratings00 Ratings
    Live reporting6.42 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customer interaction analytics7.31 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Lifesize CxEngageMaestro
    Small Businesses
    Zendesk Talk
    Score8.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Genesys Multicloud CX (discontinued)
    Score8 out of 10
    Quantum Workplace Engagement Surveys and Pulses
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Bright Pattern Contact Center
    Score8.4 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Lifesize CxEngageMaestro
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.7
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Lifesize CxEngageMaestro
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Lifesize
    CxEngage can handle some more complex flow options that other vendors don't seem to be able to do. The integration for voice calls with Salesforce is a huge plus. The integration of email support with Salesforce is a BIG miss. After fighting with it for a year, we finally just turned it off and use Salesforce Omnichannel for email support. Chat using Salesforce Live Agent worked fine enough.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Madison
    Maestro is well suited for demand planning scenarios if you need to adjust your plan based on historical data. With the Demand Override option, the plan can be easily derived to the least granular level of the hierarchy. There are ML features to handle the outliers in our plan. This is less appropriate if you want to migrate more custom and complex logic from SAP APO.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Lifesize
    • Great flexibility working with flow creation and editing
    • Great support staff
    • Good overall package for workforce management and quality monitoring
    • Integrates well with our tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Madison
    • Customer Support - I appreciate that I always get a quick response, if not immediate with easy to follow solutions to my concerns/issues. Their customer support team is always positive, friendly and helpful!
    • Easy to Learn and Understand - I am not great with technology but I find Maestro easy to learn, use and navigate. It is very user friendly.
    • Ability to Easily Update Charges - I appreciate the ease of access to Member and guest billing and folios and how easy it is for me to post, remove or reverse charges as need be.
    • One Interface - I appreciate being able to track member information and reservations in one area! What a great tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Lifesize
    • Stronger support and more reliable system for users not on a commercial network
    • Consumer friendly and intuitive reporting and dashboard tools. build canned reports
    • Reporting: Ability to get a combined SVL for all queues included on a report (now we manually calculate after exporting the report into excel). Same for all major data points (ASA, AHT, etc.)
    • Ability to include abandoned calls and an abandonment percentage which excludes short abandons on the Queue summary report. Now the report just shows total abandons and abandonment percentage so if we want to exclude short abandons we have to pull a separate report to find out how many calls abandoned in less than 10 seconds then calculate the "true abandoned number" (calls abandoned minus short abandons)
    • Ability to change what is considered a "short abandon" and then report on it. Right now the only option is the built in tracking of calls that abandoned in equal to or less than 10 seconds.
    • Ability to "save" an agents "default" skill profile so that any changes we make can be returned to "BAU" with a click of a button
    • quicker data/historical report retrieval
    • way to separate what we have listed as a queue name for reporting vs. what is used for the queue name in the "whisper" (the issue we had with WT queue naming conventions because we had to have the whisper be super precise)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Madison
    • No ability to view contact information from a home screen (must click into profile to see phone number)
    • Feels a bit archaic
    • Would be nice to see "flags" or ways to mark students for calling
    • Wish that the 'attempted call' option turned a student yellow instead of keeping them red
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Lifesize
    No answers on this topic
    Madison
    Maestro is what we are comfortable with and probably what we'll stay with, but it can be slow at times and lacks certain functionalities
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Lifesize
    No answers on this topic
    Madison
    AI guidance can be used to identify the outliers with minimal time. The system will provide the high-priority exceptions with clear context and suggested actions. If we modify the forecast, it will immediately recalculate the capacity, component availability, and margin impacts. Demand Preview and Supply Network planning can provide KPIs like Total Demand and Total Supply forecast. These KPIs can be used to check the performance of the production plants.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Lifesize
    No answers on this topic
    Madison
    I love Maestro support! They are always available or get back to you quickly. The employees that work at Maestro must get treated well because they are always positive and patient on the phone with me. And, even though I am not great with technology they always help me find a solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Lifesize
    We implemented in 2018 and were only given 8 weeks to do it...as per the direction of our parent company at the time. Serenova at the time responded well and we were able to go Live within 8-weeks...albeit the product overall was a big change and had gaps in features over our previous contact management solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Madison
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Lifesize
    It's been too many years...I don't remember. Except in 2021 we looked briefly at Amazon and Salesforce call center offerings. Both were too basic at the time that even if we got a great deal on licensing (we are a Salesforce house for other things), we couldn't easily (or at all) do things like Callbacks and some of the more robust flow buildouts that we have in place today with Lifesize.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Madison
    I have experience with SAP IBP in my previous organization. Compared to IBP, Maestro uses the concurrent planning engine. The Performance of Maestro is better. SAP IBP is mainly built for the SAP Environment. Maestro can be used with different ERP systems as well. We were having some non-APO market planning. Maestro can be used to address this scenario as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Lifesize
    • lower operational costs
    • improved agent productivity
    • improved flexibility in design and admin work
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Madison
    • At one point our step pricing was not working properly so we did lose some room revenue. Maestro helped us get this resolved.
    • Maestro saves time, which saves money, by having all of our member billing, reservations and more in one location.
    • No other impacts that I can think of.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Lifesize CxEngage Screenshots

    Screenshot of Agent Interface - SFDC Integrated AgentScreenshot of Agent Interface - Skylight Desktop Chat InteractionScreenshot of Agent Interface - Skylight Mockup 1Screenshot of Agent Interface - Skylight Mockup 2Screenshot of Chat - Mockup 1Screenshot of Chat - Mockup 2