TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Lifesize CxEngage

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/ACxEngage is a cloud contact center solution designed to meet users' needs and work in their environment. Unlike monolithic architectures and on-premises solutions, CxEngage is a ‘born-in-the-cloud’ platform to deliver unified visibility across voice, video, and digital channels. CxEngage is designed to just work anywhere, and to be implemented in a few days or weeks.

    $85

    per month per user

    Nectar Desk

    Score8 out of 10
    Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
    Nectar Desk is call center software for a variety of industries. It includes a suite of call center software features such as call recording, IVRs and call transfers. Additionally, it integrates with CRM platforms in order to ensure that agents can work efficiently between Nectar Desk and their CRM. It also has advanced agent analytics which allow users to analyze their agents’ performance and make staffing adjustments as necessary.

    $50

    per month 1 agent

    Pricing
    Lifesize CxEngageNectar Desk
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Lifesize CxEngageNectar Desk
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Lifesize CxEngageNectar Desk
    Contact Center Software
    Comparison of Contact Center Software features of Lifesize CxEngage and Nectar Desk
    Feature
    Lifesize CxEngage
    6.9
    2 Ratings
    20% below category average
    Nectar Desk
    9.2
    1 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Agent dashboard7.31 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Outbound response7.31 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Call forwarding6.41 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Interactive voice response7.31 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    REST APIs6.41 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Call tracking7.72 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Multichannel integration6.32 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    CRM software integration6.41 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Validate callers00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Click-to-call (CTC)00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Warm transfer00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Predictive dialing00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Call scripts00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Workforce Optimization (WFO)
    Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of Lifesize CxEngage and Nectar Desk
    Feature
    Lifesize CxEngage
    7.0
    2 Ratings
    17% below category average
    Nectar Desk
    8.6
    1 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Inbound call routing7.32 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Recording8.62 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Call analytics6.82 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Historical reporting5.92 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Live reporting6.42 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Customer interaction analytics7.31 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Omnichannel inbound routing00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Quality management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Lifesize CxEngageNectar Desk
    Small Businesses
    Zendesk Talk
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Zendesk Talk
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Genesys Multicloud CX (discontinued)
    Score8 out of 10
    Genesys Multicloud CX (discontinued)
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Bright Pattern Contact Center
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Bright Pattern Contact Center
    Score8.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Lifesize CxEngageNectar Desk
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.7
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Lifesize CxEngageNectar Desk
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Lifesize
    CxEngage can handle some more complex flow options that other vendors don't seem to be able to do. The integration for voice calls with Salesforce is a huge plus. The integration of email support with Salesforce is a BIG miss. After fighting with it for a year, we finally just turned it off and use Salesforce Omnichannel for email support. Chat using Salesforce Live Agent worked fine enough.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NectarDesk Inc.
    I would recommend Nectar Desk if you are going to launch it across an entire organization. By launching for only one department, it has been extremely difficult to not have the connectivity we want across the entire company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Lifesize
    • Great flexibility working with flow creation and editing
    • Great support staff
    • Good overall package for workforce management and quality monitoring
    • Integrates well with our tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NectarDesk Inc.
    • Customizing Multiple Ring Groups: Allows for different call routing options depending on what phone number is dialed by a caller
    • Agent Login Tracking & Analytics: I can see minute by minute details of my team's login status and better understand how they're using their time
    • IVR Set Up: I can set up and edit/change IVR settings with the click of a few buttons, it's super easy!
    • Call History Tracking: I can easily filter and view all calls for the day to see what was inbound vs outbound, how many calls were handled by each agent, how many calls were missed, how many were outside of business hours, what the dispositions for each call were, and MORE. The Call History analytics are GREAT.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Lifesize
    • Stronger support and more reliable system for users not on a commercial network
    • Consumer friendly and intuitive reporting and dashboard tools. build canned reports
    • Reporting: Ability to get a combined SVL for all queues included on a report (now we manually calculate after exporting the report into excel). Same for all major data points (ASA, AHT, etc.)
    • Ability to include abandoned calls and an abandonment percentage which excludes short abandons on the Queue summary report. Now the report just shows total abandons and abandonment percentage so if we want to exclude short abandons we have to pull a separate report to find out how many calls abandoned in less than 10 seconds then calculate the "true abandoned number" (calls abandoned minus short abandons)
    • Ability to change what is considered a "short abandon" and then report on it. Right now the only option is the built in tracking of calls that abandoned in equal to or less than 10 seconds.
    • Ability to "save" an agents "default" skill profile so that any changes we make can be returned to "BAU" with a click of a button
    • quicker data/historical report retrieval
    • way to separate what we have listed as a queue name for reporting vs. what is used for the queue name in the "whisper" (the issue we had with WT queue naming conventions because we had to have the whisper be super precise)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NectarDesk Inc.
    • When a caller becomes assigned to an agent, SMS notifications are only sent to that agent. This is difficult for our call center manager to monitor if the team is handling all SMS replies efficiently and effectively.
    • Because Nectar Desk is a chrome-based calling software, we are limited in accessing the platform. Due to the ongoing pandemic, this presented a challenge in making sure that all agents' at-home computers were capable of running the software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Lifesize
    We implemented in 2018 and were only given 8 weeks to do it...as per the direction of our parent company at the time. Serenova at the time responded well and we were able to go Live within 8-weeks...albeit the product overall was a big change and had gaps in features over our previous contact management solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NectarDesk Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Lifesize
    It's been too many years...I don't remember. Except in 2021 we looked briefly at Amazon and Salesforce call center offerings. Both were too basic at the time that even if we got a great deal on licensing (we are a Salesforce house for other things), we couldn't easily (or at all) do things like Callbacks and some of the more robust flow buildouts that we have in place today with Lifesize.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NectarDesk Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Lifesize
    • lower operational costs
    • improved agent productivity
    • improved flexibility in design and admin work
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NectarDesk Inc.
    • As the marketing agency that implemented this software for a client, we have 100% insight into call performance. Our client previously throughout random numbers, was always guessing on his team's performance, and now we have actual insight into how the intake team is truly performing—we know 100% of the inbound calls they make, how many outbound calls are made in a day, and how much time is spent 'idle'. This has allowed our client to hire the appropriate number of call center staff based on actual data and has allowed us to shift our marketing budget to focus on driving the right callers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Lifesize CxEngage Screenshots

    Screenshot of Agent Interface - SFDC Integrated AgentScreenshot of Agent Interface - Skylight Desktop Chat InteractionScreenshot of Agent Interface - Skylight Mockup 1Screenshot of Agent Interface - Skylight Mockup 2Screenshot of Chat - Mockup 1Screenshot of Chat - Mockup 2

    Nectar Desk Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshot