Lifesize CxEngage vs. Nectar Desk

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Lifesize CxEngage
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
CxEngage is a cloud contact center solution designed to meet users' needs and work in their environment. Unlike monolithic architectures and on-premises solutions, CxEngage is a ‘born-in-the-cloud’ platform to deliver unified visibility across voice, video, and digital channels. CxEngage is designed to just work anywhere, and to be implemented in a few days or weeks.
$85
per month per user
Nectar Desk
Score 8.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Nectar Desk is call center software for a wide variety of industries. It includes a complete suite of call center software features such as call recording, IVRs and call transfers. Additionally, it integrates with many CRM platforms in order to ensure that agents can work efficiently between Nectar Desk and their CRM. It also has advanced agent analytics which allow users to analyze their agents’ performance and make staffing adjustments as necessary.N/A
Pricing
Lifesize CxEngageNectar Desk
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Lifesize CxEngageNectar Desk
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Lifesize CxEngageNectar Desk
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Lifesize CxEngageNectar Desk
Contact Center Software
Comparison of Contact Center Software features of Product A and Product B
Lifesize CxEngage
6.9
2 Ratings
19% below category average
Nectar Desk
9.2
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Agent dashboard7.31 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Outbound response7.31 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Call forwarding6.41 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Interactive voice response7.31 Ratings10.01 Ratings
REST APIs6.41 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Call tracking7.72 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Multichannel integration6.42 Ratings8.01 Ratings
CRM software integration6.41 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Validate callers00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Click-to-call (CTC)00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Warm transfer00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Predictive dialing00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Call scripts00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Workforce Optimization (WFO)
Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of Product A and Product B
Lifesize CxEngage
7.0
2 Ratings
16% below category average
Nectar Desk
8.6
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Inbound call routing7.32 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Recording8.62 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Call analytics6.82 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Historical reporting5.92 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Live reporting6.42 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Customer interaction analytics7.31 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Omnichannel inbound routing00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Quality management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Lifesize CxEngageNectar Desk
Small Businesses
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Score 9.8 out of 10
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Score 9.8 out of 10
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Google Cloud Contact Center AI
Google Cloud Contact Center AI
Score 8.3 out of 10
Google Cloud Contact Center AI
Google Cloud Contact Center AI
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Lifesize CxEngageNectar Desk
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(2 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Lifesize CxEngageNectar Desk
Likelihood to Recommend
Lifesize
CxEngage can handle some more complex flow options that other vendors don't seem to be able to do. The integration for voice calls with Salesforce is a huge plus. The integration of email support with Salesforce is a BIG miss. After fighting with it for a year, we finally just turned it off and use Salesforce Omnichannel for email support. Chat using Salesforce Live Agent worked fine enough.
Read full review
NectarDesk Inc.
I would recommend Nectar Desk if you are going to launch it across an entire organization. By launching for only one department, it has been extremely difficult to not have the connectivity we want across the entire company.
Read full review
Pros
Lifesize
  • Great flexibility working with flow creation and editing
  • Great support staff
  • Good overall package for workforce management and quality monitoring
  • Integrates well with our tools.
Read full review
NectarDesk Inc.
  • Customizing Multiple Ring Groups: Allows for different call routing options depending on what phone number is dialed by a caller
  • Agent Login Tracking & Analytics: I can see minute by minute details of my team's login status and better understand how they're using their time
  • IVR Set Up: I can set up and edit/change IVR settings with the click of a few buttons, it's super easy!
  • Call History Tracking: I can easily filter and view all calls for the day to see what was inbound vs outbound, how many calls were handled by each agent, how many calls were missed, how many were outside of business hours, what the dispositions for each call were, and MORE. The Call History analytics are GREAT.
Read full review
Cons
Lifesize
  • Stronger support and more reliable system for users not on a commercial network
  • Consumer friendly and intuitive reporting and dashboard tools. build canned reports
  • Reporting: Ability to get a combined SVL for all queues included on a report (now we manually calculate after exporting the report into excel). Same for all major data points (ASA, AHT, etc.)
  • Ability to include abandoned calls and an abandonment percentage which excludes short abandons on the Queue summary report. Now the report just shows total abandons and abandonment percentage so if we want to exclude short abandons we have to pull a separate report to find out how many calls abandoned in less than 10 seconds then calculate the "true abandoned number" (calls abandoned minus short abandons)
  • Ability to change what is considered a "short abandon" and then report on it. Right now the only option is the built in tracking of calls that abandoned in equal to or less than 10 seconds.
  • Ability to "save" an agents "default" skill profile so that any changes we make can be returned to "BAU" with a click of a button
  • quicker data/historical report retrieval
  • way to separate what we have listed as a queue name for reporting vs. what is used for the queue name in the "whisper" (the issue we had with WT queue naming conventions because we had to have the whisper be super precise)
Read full review
NectarDesk Inc.
  • When a caller becomes assigned to an agent, SMS notifications are only sent to that agent. This is difficult for our call center manager to monitor if the team is handling all SMS replies efficiently and effectively.
  • Because Nectar Desk is a chrome-based calling software, we are limited in accessing the platform. Due to the ongoing pandemic, this presented a challenge in making sure that all agents' at-home computers were capable of running the software.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Lifesize
We implemented in 2018 and were only given 8 weeks to do it...as per the direction of our parent company at the time. Serenova at the time responded well and we were able to go Live within 8-weeks...albeit the product overall was a big change and had gaps in features over our previous contact management solution.
Read full review
NectarDesk Inc.
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Lifesize
It's been too many years...I don't remember. Except in 2021 we looked briefly at Amazon and Salesforce call center offerings. Both were too basic at the time that even if we got a great deal on licensing (we are a Salesforce house for other things), we couldn't easily (or at all) do things like Callbacks and some of the more robust flow buildouts that we have in place today with Lifesize.
Read full review
NectarDesk Inc.
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Lifesize
  • lower operational costs
  • improved agent productivity
  • improved flexibility in design and admin work
Read full review
NectarDesk Inc.
  • As the marketing agency that implemented this software for a client, we have 100% insight into call performance. Our client previously throughout random numbers, was always guessing on his team's performance, and now we have actual insight into how the intake team is truly performing—we know 100% of the inbound calls they make, how many outbound calls are made in a day, and how much time is spent 'idle'. This has allowed our client to hire the appropriate number of call center staff based on actual data and has allowed us to shift our marketing budget to focus on driving the right callers.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Lifesize CxEngage Screenshots

Screenshot of Agent Interface - SFDC Integrated AgentScreenshot of Agent Interface - Skylight Desktop Chat InteractionScreenshot of Agent Interface - Skylight Mockup 1Screenshot of Agent Interface - Skylight Mockup 2Screenshot of Chat - Mockup 1Screenshot of Chat - Mockup 2

Nectar Desk Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of