Liquibase vs. Tricentis qTest

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Liquibase
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Liquibase is a database change management tool that extends DevOps best practices to the database, helping teams release software faster and safer by bringing the database change process into existing CI/CD automation. According to the 2021 Accelerate State of DevOps Report, elite performers are 3.4 times more likely to incorporate database change management into their process than low performers. Liquibase value proposition: Liquibase speeds up the development…N/A
Tricentis qTest
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Tricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.
$1,200
per year per user
Pricing
LiquibaseTricentis qTest
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LiquibaseTricentis qTest
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LiquibaseTricentis qTest
Features
LiquibaseTricentis qTest
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Liquibase
-
Ratings
Tricentis qTest
8.0
32 Ratings
1% below category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings8.531 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings7.727 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings7.78 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings8.331 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings7.726 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LiquibaseTricentis qTest
Small Businesses
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.6 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.6 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LiquibaseTricentis qTest
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(59 ratings)
8.3
(34 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(4 ratings)
6.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(2 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
7.4
(57 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(2 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
LiquibaseTricentis qTest
Likelihood to Recommend
Liquibase
Liquibase is very well suited for database schema management. It works great for any DDL/DML deployments, changes made to database are easy to manage, track or troubleshoot. It comes with a wide variety of Rollback options. Liquibase Policy checks are a great way to enforce standards around Database code development across organization and prevent any unexpected from being deployed
Read full review
Tricentis
Best Case Scenario 1. Large-Scale Enterprise Testing Example: qTest’s requirement traceability and audit trails ensured compliance with strict regulatory standards 2. Agile/DevOps Teams with Jira Example:In a CI/CD pipeline, qTest’s Jira sync automated defect logging. Developers fixed bugs faster because tickets included linked test steps and screenshots. 3. Manual Regression Testing Example: Versioned test cases and bulk editing streamline repetitive workflows. Less Appropriate Scenarios 1. Small Teams with Simple Projects Example: Heavyweight for lightweight needs 2. Mobile-First Testing Example: Lacks native mobile testing features (e.g., real-device support).
Read full review
Pros
Liquibase
  • Automation - Improved data integrity and security validation, Expanded support for non-relational database types
  • Observability - Reports for code quality, security checks, updates, rollbacks, and Flows
  • Governance- Increased control of privileges and access for groups and individual users
  • Tracks every database changes by enforcing policy and compliance
  • Efficient - Standardized and self-service driven deployment process
  • Tracks every database changes by enforcing policy and compliance
  • Efficient - Standardized and self-service driven deployment process
Read full review
Tricentis
  • Highly customizable: we were able to organize our test cases in unique ways that made our work easier.
  • Connectivity with Jira: being able to pull requirements information in from Jira was a big point for us.
  • Standalone tool: Being a standalone tool on a dedicated server, we were able to have access to our tests regardless of whether our Jira server was down.
Read full review
Cons
Liquibase
  • Reducing Compatibility issues, when we upgraded Liquibase from 4.2 to 4.9. The same changeset which we were able to run on successfully using 4.2, part of it was now failing when tried to deploy using 4.9
  • We are not able to see detailed logs (for different changes) in uDeploy when deploying changes through Liquibase
  • Liquibase should rollback the if any one of the changes fails.
Read full review
Tricentis
  • In requirements , we can't add multiple test cases at once, or search multiple cases at once, need to do one by one. Here actually qtest needs to improve.
  • Linking cloud hosted qtest and on-premise TOSCA is very difficult especially when you are working with client system with security wall. It requires tunnelling software which is not recommended.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Liquibase
We are and will continue using Liquibase and it has become an integral part of our portfolio offering, any new product is by default adopting Liquibase stack.
Read full review
Tricentis
This has been a core QA management tool for our organization and integrates well with our other SDLC platforms (Azure DevOps/Jira/Katalon).
Read full review
Usability
Liquibase
Build process is too time consuming and getting extra DB instance takes a toll
Read full review
Tricentis
qTest is actually intuitive and user-friendly, despite my other scathing review aspects
Read full review
Support Rating
Liquibase
I gave this rating because I feel their customer support staff have a very good and deep knowledge about the product and they are very helpful when we are stuck on something. The customer support is passionate about their product and they are always ready to help their customer as quickly as possible.
Read full review
Tricentis
The actual answer is 0. I have never experienced worse support, whether personal or professional
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Liquibase
the database deployments helped us with increased productivity,
faster delivery and low risk.
Read full review
Tricentis
Again, supporting documentation could have been a lot better
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Liquibase
There is no real competitor when it comes to what Liquibase does - at least not at the time we considered it three years ago. It was an easy choice in this regard, but we could have said no to it if it made our workload more difficult. But our proof of concept showed there were easy wins to be had by implementing its software.
Read full review
Tricentis
All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, user-centric interface contrasts with ALM's more dated appearance and complex setup. While TestRail provides a clean user experience and caters to a broad spectrum of business, qTest's scalability, from SMBs to large enterprises, stands out. PractiTest's cloud-based solution is geared towards mid-sized companies, but qTest's flexibility, advanced analytics, and robust reporting grant teams actionable insights. qTest' approach to a more holistic test management closely aligning with modern software development practices
Read full review
Return on Investment
Liquibase
  • We need to re-educate developers to use Liquibase.
  • In some cases, it is hard to align when several teams work on the same DB.
  • On the other hand, Liquibase provides order and consistency in managing DB changes.
  • Evidence and traceability are a plus.
Read full review
Tricentis
  • Better organization and centralization of test cases has led to more cohesive team collaboration
  • Speed to delivery, deployments to production, are mostly maintained
  • Performance issues have led to testing delays requiring the team to switch to other methods which contributed to QA bottleneck issues and sometimes even missed sprint commitments
Read full review
ScreenShots

Tricentis qTest Screenshots

Screenshot of Customizable analytics and reports can be shared across the organization - additional read license requiredScreenshot of Centrally manage automated testing and environments, as well as schedule and or kickoff automated testing with any open source or proprietary toolScreenshot of qTest allows for true test case sharing across teams and projects to help standardize and scale knowledge and best practicesScreenshot of qTest integrates in real-time with Jira for full traceability to requirements during Agile test and developmentScreenshot of Build custom, event-driven workflows with any third-party solution, including ChatOps tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams, to streamline testing and drive collaborationScreenshot of Tricentis qTest comes with over 60 out-of-the-box metrics, with drag-and-drop capabilities to build custom dashboards