LMKR GeoGraphix vs. Petrel E&P

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
LMKR GeoGraphix
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
LMKR in Dubai offers GeoGraphix, a suite of applications supporting research activities for oil and gas like mapping and petrophysical modeling and well planning.N/A
Petrel E&P
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Petrel E&P, from Schlumberger, is a modular suite of applications designed to support exploratory geological study and geological modeling, with features such as data visualization, and other model building tools.N/A
Pricing
LMKR GeoGraphixPetrel E&P
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LMKR GeoGraphixPetrel E&P
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
User Ratings
LMKR GeoGraphixPetrel E&P
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
6.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
LMKR GeoGraphixPetrel E&P
Likelihood to Recommend
LMKR
I can not say where "it is or is not appropriate" in general terms, because you do not have experience in all fields of application of the program. But if you can note that within the areas where it has been applied and where better results have been obtained, it is when the results have been integrated with programs such as the ARGIS, specifically through the map module, obtaining simultaneous general visualizations of different variables. Where lower quality results have been obtained, it is when the intention is to generate contour maps with relatively little information, through the use of interpolation algorithms. I have done tests where I have results with a good amount of information and I try that the program, after removing information selectively, I generate new surfaces, in order to see how sensitive is the generated surface to the amount of information available. The results are similar to those obtained with other software that can also generate the desired surfaces.
Read full review
Schlumberger
Petrel is an extremely powerful tool and for geological 3D modeling is the go-to tool, it's Sequential Indicator Simulations, Object-Based modeling or multiple point statistics modeling workflows are top notches and I highly advise its use. I wouldn't recommend using it for seismic interpretation based on seismic attributes since it can be a little bit limited in this aspect.
Read full review
Pros
LMKR
  • It is an integral tool that allows linking information from different disciplines.
  • The software allows the projects it manages to be stored anywhere in the network where it is working, including storage devices that are connected to the network itself.
  • The integrity of the data is high, while the search engine and associated quality control maximize the degree of manageability of the data, even when the project is large.
Read full review
Schlumberger
  • Petrel handles multiple coordinate systems better than competitors.
  • The object tree organization in Petrel is intuitive and user-friendly.
  • Easy to handle data across multiple UTM zones by allowing geodesic coordinates.
Read full review
Cons
LMKR
  • It suffers from what happens to most software of this type: the resolution of isolines that define points or surfaces of the same characteristic (for example, equal depth, or the same degree of hardness), depend a lot on the interpolation algorithm that the software is selected or used directly, so in general the characteristics of these surfaces do not reliably characterize the actual conditions being studied.
  • The use of this software, in particular, is limited to machines that operate with 64-bit processors.
Read full review
Schlumberger
  • Petrel is extremely expensive, working with it in a small company is almost impossible. This shouldn't be an issue for a large company or for a big university with a large budget for investigation.
  • Since it has so many functions it can be overwhelming once you begin using it, so I highly recommend to pay for a Schlumberger instructor.
  • The seismic attributes could be improved since they are not entirely accurate.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
LMKR
The named software may have the same or higher capacity than the revised one, as far as the analysis of the data is concerned, but they do not have the capacity of visual representation that the GeoGraphix has. The interesting thing is to use the best of the different software. You can analyze with one and import the data to the GeoGraphix to make the analyzes on the platform of this one.
Read full review
Schlumberger
I use Petrel and competitor products for different functions. If I didn't have Petrel, it would be a lot more difficult to work with my aerially extensive dataset and manipulate my data with geographic coordinates.
Read full review
Return on Investment
LMKR
  • It has enlarged the size of the study area due to its great data handling capacity.
  • It has increased the possibility of recreating and posing different scenarios, as well as the sensitivity of these to changes in the values of any of the parameters involved.
  • The speed with which you can obtain results for different study scenarios has also increased.
Read full review
Schlumberger
  • Working at the University of Oklahoma the investment is well paid since geoscientist are formed with the best tool available.
  • Keeping in mind that the software is really expensive, for the product to have an economic positive impact the project's revenue has to be large.
Read full review
ScreenShots