MailerCheck is an email deliverability platform that provides a suite of professional tools that businesses can use to optimize their email performance. Email verification provides accurate and comprehensive reports about email list health—verify a single email, an entire list, or in real-time with API on a website or app. MailerCheck can be used to analyze email campaigns for deliverability red flags such as spam words, broken images/links,…
$10
one-time fee per user
Proofy
Score4.9 out of 10
N/A
Proofy from the company of the same name (Proofy.io) headquartered in Hong Kong is a pay-for-check email verification service.
N/A
Pricing
MailerCheck
Proofy
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MailerCheck
Proofy
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$10 one-time fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Pay as you go pricing:
Credits Price per credit
1K to 5K $ 0.01
5K to 10K $ 0.009
10K to 25K $ 0.008
25K to 50K $ 0.007
50K to 100K $ 0.006
Monthly subscription:
Credits / month Monthly cost
2,500 $ 20
5,000 $ 36
10,000 $ 64
15,000 $ 96
20,000 $ 128
Mailcheck is not alone useful but as well effective in small, medium, and large scale sets up. Appropriate for both physical and virtual establishment in making qualitative deliverables. In the search for automated service in works, it is a search-no-further type of software. There are no inappropriate use cases reported from our team and other teams.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The system is feasible, and they have an superb customer service team always amenable to help when desired. It proffer a very great service and a free trial for new users. Very speedy and forthright to use and very inexpensive. Great tool to verify emails, its all good about the product work very fluently and entirely attractive
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think they could generate an expansion of the number of emails to thousands I have had some scanning problems; I am not sure if it is something overcrowded.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Over time, we have used mail verification software like Mailgun and Mailfloss. While they have individual unique features, MailerCheck has been more useful. Although, unlike MailerCheck, they supported free-trial with access to all or most features. Moreso, MailerCheck is a recent tool tailored to meet up the advancement of tech, and ease the burden of users -- Providing an automated service option.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The server of the Lusha Extension was very low that's why leave the software and the results of proofy was just amazing overall. We love the adeptness to send a bulk email list, as well as integrate the platform with API. overall features are very effective and very easy to use.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info