LevelBlue DbProtect vs. Trellix Data Center Security Suite

Monitoring database activity internally was a huge concern for my company, which is why we implemented DbProtect. I would recommend this to anyone that has lower end traffic on their SQL servers. My company appeared to be too big for DbProtect and was not a good fit, but it would be useful for a smaller company.

Incentivized

The suite works well to monitor the day to day unattended activities from support personnel, but in case I need to micro-manage, there are no inbuilt rules and I need to customize the same.

• Easy to create filters.
• Interface was easy to use.
• Process to create filters as straight forward.

Incentivized

• McAfee’s monitoring and virtual patching solutions

Incentivized

• Speed of interface.
• The trace function utilized high resources at times and would sometimes crash servers.
• Support could have been better, but this is when the company was under Trustwave and even the owners before then.

Incentivized

• Support is a major issue. You need Mcafee premium service for the expected expertise.
• Deployment on Sun Solaris.
• Vulnerability Manager should accept customizations.

Due to support issues only.

We did not get much expertise in the limited support extended by the Mcafee team.

The price is the complete opposite and Imperva provided things that DbProtect did not. I would suggest a cleaner interface and more reporting in DbProtect. These things may exist now, but did not when I was a customer of DbProtect. DbProtect when configured correctly will do what you want it to and help secure databases.

Incentivized

The Forecepoint product which we evaluated was better but this was a decision taken by the entire group.

• Increase employee efficiency by putting all the information in front of us via alerts.
• Helped secure our database tables.
• I believe better customer service is needed for this product.

Incentivized

• It has a positive impact on over data security and helps in managing data.

Incentivized