Lucas Recoaro
Solutions Architect
Chose RavenDB
The use and implementation of RavenDB is way easier than MongoDB.
Memcached vs. RavenDB
Memcached vs. RavenDB
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Memcached | N/A | Memcached is a free & open source (BSD license), distributed memory object caching system, generic in nature, but intended for use in speeding up dynamic web applications by alleviating database load. | N/A | |
 RavenDB | N/A | RavenDB is a NoSQL Document Database that is fully transactional (ACID) across the database and throughout clusters. The database minimizes the need for third party addons, tools, or support to boost developer productivity and get projects into production fast. Users can setup and secure a data cluster deploy in the cloud, on-premise or in a hybrid environment. RavenDB offers a Database as a Service solution, allowing users to pass on all… | N/A |
| Memcached | RavenDB | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Memcached | RavenDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products |  Memcached No answer on this topic |  RavenDB  Ayush Dutta Data Management Chose RavenDB First of all, Microsoft Access is also a powerful, efficient, and free database. But the feel of it, I mean the GUI is not all great for me. It is very eye-stressing. MongoDB is also a good database, it too is efficient, productive, and powerful. But, upon this, RavenDB is a …  Parthesh Pandya Senior Marketing Associate Chose RavenDB RavenDB is just smarter than the competitors. The mapping reduction sorting is head and shoulders above everything else I've used. Nothing really approaches comparable in terms of complexity. Because of the searching of predetermined categories, read efficiency is terrible. …  Richard Norman Software Architect Chose RavenDB [RavenDB is] just simply much cleverer than the competition. The map reduce indexing is a league above anything else I have used. Nothing else comes close on abstraction as well. Read performance is terrifying due to querying pre calculated indexes. It is just a pity it is not …  Josh Close CEO Chose RavenDB Having ACID compliance is a big enough reason to choose RavenDB over the other products. You don't have to worry about losing your data if the plug is pulled. You're able to perform many actions within a transaction and not worry about your data being in a bad state if the …  Georgios Diamantopoulos Senior System Architect Chose RavenDB Out of the many variants of document and SQL databases out there that we have used, RavenDB is our no 1 choice for anything but the smallest projects which can be served with a very small SQL instance. Other than that, RavenDB packs more features and is easier to work with than …  Sina Zaimaran Chief Technology Officer Chose RavenDB Being that ACID and cluster transaction support is a big plus against all of them. Cool prices on Azure and AWS is another plus. The ability to search between millions of documents.  Adam Nemitoff Sofware Consultant / Developer Chose RavenDB When I first started using RavenDB, I did evaluate Mongo DB but found it to be lacking. The primary issue was that Mongo DB did not support atomic consistency for the persistence of multiple documents at the same time, although I think this may not be an issue with subsequent …  Alex Klaus Tech Lead / Architect Chose RavenDB Better .NET integration among all of them  Alan Doherty Co-founder Chose RavenDB We have evaluated or used three other databases in the process of building our product. Amazon Aurora (MySQL)  Jeremy Holt Managing Director Chose RavenDB Once I had got my head around the concept of a document database it was a happy bye-bye to SQL Server. Firebird - far too fiddly - I found myself writing a silly API to sit on top of Firebird just to do the most basic things. MongoDb - in the very short time I spent with it, it …  Wallace Turner Architect/Senior Developer/Team Leader Chose RavenDB RavenDB has a richer API, has security out of the box (via certificates), produces indexes automatically and updates them when data changes. |
| Memcached | RavenDB | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NoSQL Databases |
|
| Memcached | RavenDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses |  Redis Software Score 8.8 out of 10 |  IBM Cloudant Score 7.4 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Redis Software Score 8.8 out of 10 | IBM Cloudant Score 7.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Redis Software Score 8.8 out of 10 | IBM Cloudant Score 7.4 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Memcached | RavenDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 8.1 (0 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.5 (0 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 8.2 (0 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 8.1 (0 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 7.3 (0 ratings) |
| Configurability | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (0 ratings) |
| Memcached | RavenDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
Parthesh Pandya Senior Marketing Associate |
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
Alan Doherty Co-founder |
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
Richard Norman Software Architect |
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
Sina Zaimaran Chief Technology Officer |
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
Parthesh Pandya Senior Marketing Associate |
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
Josh Close CEO |
| ScreenShots |