MicroMain vs. Valuekeep

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
MicroMain
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
MicroMain in Austin, Texas offers facility maintenance management software.N/A
Valuekeep
Score 0.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Valuekeep’s cloud-based software aims to help reduce maintenance costs, improve teams' productivity, and increase the return on assets. The solution is developed and designed to simplify the maintenance of today, connect teams in the field, and predict future events. Valuekeep CMMS can adapt to the business regardless of the industry it operates in. Designed to end paperwork and clipboards as all the information is registered automatically in the…N/A
Pricing
MicroMainValuekeep
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MicroMainValuekeep
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
MicroMainValuekeep
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.4 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.4 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MicroMainValuekeep
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
MicroMainValuekeep
Likelihood to Recommend
MicroMain Corporation
Overall, MicroMain has lots of features and flexible to use as an integration solution in the company. There are some area need improvement. MicroMain support has fast response time and is always helpful when we have issues. The workaround will be suggested for any problems we have. Their development team always find improvement and listen to their client voices to make their CMMS a better solution.
Read full review
Valuekeep
No answers on this topic
Pros
MicroMain Corporation
  • The design is flexible to set up assets hierarchy.
  • PMWO is easy to set up.
  • Can manage multiple sites and locations.
  • Can manage projects within MicroMain
Read full review
Valuekeep
No answers on this topic
Cons
MicroMain Corporation
  • The spec sheet is difficult to set and attach to PMWO.
  • Inspection cannot be grouped and is difficult to categorize and assign to each PMWO based on the asset type.
  • Part inventory is subtracted only when WO is closed. It should be subtracted as soon as it's reserved by WO or PMWO. This cause the inaccuracy of the number of parts available in stock.
Read full review
Valuekeep
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
MicroMain Corporation
MicroMain has more features and more flexible to use. Multiple locations are allowed. Parts inventory can be set up easily. Asset hierarchy can be easy to manage. Software can be centralized and standardized across departments within the company. We currently use it for multiple product lines across departments and facility maintenance. Overall, it's easy to implement and streamline throughout the company.
Read full review
Valuekeep
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
MicroMain Corporation
  • MicroMain helps move from paper-based to paperless system.
  • MicroMain helps reduce 1000+ hours per year for technician on administration work and the technician can focus on their real work in production.
  • Their paperless system saves 2000+ paper sheets per year used to print PMWO, WO and Spec sheet.
  • Parts inventory is closed to real-time which helps PO processing to be more effective.
Read full review
Valuekeep
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Valuekeep Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of