Microsoft Azure IoT Hub vs. Watson IoT Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure IoT Hub
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure IoT Hub is a managed service for bidirectional communication between IoT devices and Azure. Azure IoT Hub provides a cloud-hosted solution back end to connect virtually any device. Users can extend their solutions from the cloud to the edge with per-device authentication, built-in device management, and scaled provisioning.
$10
per month per IoT Hub unit (per month)
Watson IoT Platform
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
The IBM Watson IoT Platform is an Internet-of-things is a managed cloud-hosted solution supporting device connectivity, control, visualization, and overall device visibility and management. It provides a UI where users can add and manage devices, control access to IoT service, and monitor usage. With its device management service, users can perform device actions like rebooting or updating firmware, receive device diagnostics and metadata, or perform bulk device addition and removal.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Azure IoT HubWatson IoT Platform
Editions & Modules
B1
$10
per month per IoT Hub unit
S1
$25
per month per IoT Hub unit
B2
$50
per month per IoT Hub unit
S2
$250
per month per IoT Hub unit
B3
$500
per month per IoT Hub unit
S3
$2500
per month per IoT Hub unit
Free
Free
per month per IoT Hub unit
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure IoT HubWatson IoT Platform
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Azure IoT HubWatson IoT Platform
Considered Both Products
Azure IoT Hub
Chose Microsoft Azure IoT Hub
Very comparable to the AWS offer, although brings additional security. Far ahead the rest of the industry, with end to end architecture and feature-set. Geo availability is a plus as well. Pricing could be more flexible or easy to understand - too many different components to …
Watson IoT Platform

No answer on this topic

Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Microsoft Azure IoT HubWatson IoT Platform
Internet of Things
Comparison of Internet of Things features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Azure IoT Hub
8.7
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Watson IoT Platform
-
Ratings
IoT Device Management9.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Device Security9.74 Ratings00 Ratings
IoT Data Management9.64 Ratings00 Ratings
IoT Analytics6.14 Ratings00 Ratings
IoT Integration8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Azure IoT HubWatson IoT Platform
Small Businesses
AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 7.7 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 7.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Azure IoT HubWatson IoT Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(4 ratings)
8.4
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Azure IoT HubWatson IoT Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
We are using the Azure IOT hub for solving the multitenancy problem within our research project. We are consuming data from various resources and communicating it with different devices on our hybrid cloud. We also use Azure IoT as a bridge between two business Intelligence sources which are really hard to connect devices.
Read full review
IBM
For large companies with large-scale manufacturing, electronics management, and infrastructures that require lots of maintenance, IBM Watson IoT is a must-have. It greatly increases performance, decreases downtime, and is an all-around great management dashboard. This is best for infrastructures that have a larger infrastructures of IoT devices in an enterprise/manufacturing setting, otherwise IBM Watson may not bring many benefits to your team.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Massive registration and deployment of new devices.
  • Easy integration with other Azure services.
  • Handling security if devices.
Read full review
IBM
  • The asset information is available in both static and dynamic format (from thermal images, to OEM data, to time series data). The ability to ingest all the information using a single platform has great value.
  • Another benefit is a seamless integration with Maximo. This has been a challenge with other 3rd party systems available.
  • The experience of IBM Maximo systems updates is positive.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Hardware and embedded integration could improve or be at parity with competitor.
  • Pricing model not as flexible as competitor.
Read full review
IBM
  • Some of the tutorials could use a little more improvement - While there is a considerable amount of documentation, most of the good documentation for Watson IoT we found to be from third-parties.
  • Administration and billing tools could use a bit more improvement - The UI is a bit clunky and poorly-designed here.
  • Be prepared to work with IBM support to get this going - Their turn-around support for inquiries can be lengthy, and setup time may also be quite lengthy because of this.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
Azure IoT support professionals are strong, and always provide timely responses. Vast documentation and examples are available, plus a network of professionals in the market. It's very comparable to the main competitor offer, and easily integrated into the main Azure product offer. Azure IoT is not a new solution, so it is very mature and support can easily address any day to day or architectural concern you have.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
We require Azure integration, data security and simple development. IoT Hub ticked all those boxes.
Read full review
IBM
Predix has recently launched their Asset Performance management Unified system. I am keen to see how it stacks up against Watson.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • As a student, we are using student program subscription which is cheaper than an individual or business subscription.
  • Our school devices our efficiently communicating with each other which has increased the revenue of our school.
  • It provides strong and robust cloud communication within the premises which also helped in increased in the school reputation.
Read full review
IBM
  • Positive - This tool greatly increases most company's manufacturing and production efficiency, and the use-cases are extensive. It was a great way of decreasing down-time for us.
  • Negative - Took lots of work and energy to get up and running, we had to rely on IBM support and tutorials many times during this process.
  • Positive - Quite cheap, most of the tiers of pricing cost very little, and it's possible to use Watson IoT for a few months for free to see if it is beneficial for your company.
Read full review
ScreenShots