Microsoft Build of OpenJDK vs. Red Hat Runtimes

Microsoft Build of OpenJDK

Microsoft Build of OpenJDK

7 Reviews and Ratings

Red Hat Runtimes

Red Hat Runtimes

2 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Microsoft Build of OpenJDK	Score 7.8 out of 10	N/A	The Microsoft Build of OpenJDK is a no-cost distribution of OpenJDK that's open source and available for free for anyone to deploy anywhere. It includes Long-Term Support (LTS) binaries for Java 11 and Java 17 on x64 server and desktop environments on macOS, Linux, and Windows, AArch64/ARM64 on Linux and Windows, binaries for macOS on Apple Silicon (AArch64/M1), and musl libc compiled binaries for Alpine Linux on x64.	$0
Red Hat Runtimes	Score 10.0 out of 10	N/A	Red Hat Runtimes provides modern platforms to develop and run new and legacy applications—including Spring Boot, Reactive, JavaScript, Java EE, and MicroProfile—in a single ecosystem. It includes support for OpenJDK, in-memory datastore, and single sign-on completes the system. The products combine, enabling users to share resources and build more applications faster.	N/A

Pricing

Microsoft Build of OpenJDK

Red Hat Runtimes

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Build of OpenJDK	Red Hat Runtimes
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Best Alternatives
	Microsoft Build of OpenJDK	Red Hat Runtimes
Small Businesses	GraalVM Score 9.1 out of 10	GraalVM Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Oracle Java SE Score 8.4 out of 10	Oracle Java SE Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises	GraalVM Score 9.1 out of 10	GraalVM Score 9.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Microsoft Build of OpenJDK	Red Hat Runtimes
Likelihood to Recommend	7.5 (2 ratings)	10.0 (2 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Microsoft Build of OpenJDK	Red Hat Runtimes
Likelihood to Recommend	Microsoft I think of a few areas when looking at Microsoft Build of OpenJDK. The first is what is your cost to run for your intended product or project, if you are strapped and fall within the supported areas of Microsoft Build of OpenJDK then it's a no brainer, Microsoft Build of OpenJDK is for you! Lastly, I think of support in the respect to running into a wall and needing a fix. It can take a while for open source tools to produce fixes that the community warrants, so again if you aren't strapped for time and haven't run into a wall and could afford to wait for fixes or relevant patches then again Microsoft Build of OpenJDK is for you. Not everyone has this luxury, but these are a few areas to think about. Incentivized Harvey Wyche Director of Product Management Read full review	Red Hat Hat Red A collection of goods, equipment, and parts used in the creation and upkeep of cloud-native apps is known as runtimes. It provides lightweight runtimes and frameworks for highly distributed cloud architectures, like microservices, similar to Quarkus. Frameworks and runtimes selection of languages, runtimes, and frameworks enables developers and architects to select the best tool for the job. Quarkus, Spring Boot, Vert. x, and Node.js are all supported. In-memory distributed caching is a distributed in-memory data management system built for scalability and quick access to huge amounts of data. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Microsoft Support for the Java libraries that are common use today Support for various architecture environments - Mac, Windows, Linux, etc... Provides a low cost or rather no cost alternative Incentivized Harvey Wyche Director of Product Management Read full review	Red Hat Java micro services Open JDK Caching Incentivized A. Kıvanç Güler Hybrid Cloud Automation Sales Leader, Finance Read full review
Cons	Microsoft Since it's open source, enterprise support is less than as if you are running paid like an Oracle JDK. Performance is improving and is I would say on par with paid solutions, this could improve to help with growth. Stability will happen over time with more contributions and fixes Incentivized Harvey Wyche Director of Product Management Read full review	Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Applications. JBoss Web Server. Identity management and access control. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Microsoft Microsoft Build of OpenJDK stacks up against Oracle JDK (paid) very well. From both a performance, implementation, library support, and collaboration aspect. Incentivized Harvey Wyche Director of Product Management Read full review	Red Hat Native integration with Redhat Open Shift Container Platform and Cloud native micro services development especially Java micro services with quarkus which very good alternative framework on that area. Open source support and Open JDK support are extremely important for most of the java developers and communities. Good documentation and howto tutorials Incentivized A. Kıvanç Güler Hybrid Cloud Automation Sales Leader, Finance Read full review
Return on Investment	Microsoft No cost alternative to paid JDK platforms Performance is that of paid JDK platforms in my opinion Community contribution is a bonus for contributed code and open collaboration Incentivized Harvey Wyche Director of Product Management Read full review	Red Hat Total Economic Impact (TEI) study. Red hat openShift. Red hat services and support. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots