Great free open source Open JDK alternative!
Overall Satisfaction with Microsoft Build of OpenJDK
Primarily the use case was to help drive low cost development for workloads in creating cloud based digital prouducts. Microsoft Build OpenJDK allows for support of Java 17 library for use in deployed Linux environments for us to package.
Pros
- Support for the Java libraries that are common use today
- Support for various architecture environments - Mac, Windows, Linux, etc...
- Provides a low cost or rather no cost alternative
Cons
- Since it's open source, enterprise support is less than as if you are running paid like an Oracle JDK.
- Performance is improving and is I would say on par with paid solutions, this could improve to help with growth.
- Stability will happen over time with more contributions and fixes
- No cost alternative to paid JDK platforms
- Performance is that of paid JDK platforms in my opinion
- Community contribution is a bonus for contributed code and open collaboration
Microsoft Build of OpenJDK stacks up against Oracle JDK (paid) very well. From both a performance, implementation, library support, and collaboration aspect.
Do you think Microsoft Build of OpenJDK delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Microsoft Build of OpenJDK's feature set?
Yes
Did Microsoft Build of OpenJDK live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Microsoft Build of OpenJDK go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Microsoft Build of OpenJDK again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation