Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) for Azure, on-premises, and multicloud (Amazon AWS and Google GCP) resources.N/A
SonarQube
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
SonarQube is an automated code review solution, serving as the verification layer for code quality and SDLC security. SonarQube is used to ensure that code is secure, reliable, and maintainable. It is available through SaaS or self-managed deployment.
$0
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for CloudSonarQubeVeracode
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Cloud-based: Free
$0
Self-managed: Developer
Starting at $720 annually
per year per installation
Self-managed: Enterprise
Contact sales for pricing
per year per installation
Cloud-based: Enterprise
Contact sales for pricing
per year per installation
Cloud-based: Teams
Starting at $32 per month
per month per installation
Self-managed: Data Center
Contact sales for pricing
per year per installation
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Defender for CloudSonarQubeVeracode
Free Trial
YesYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDeveloper pricing options available
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Defender for CloudSonarQubeVeracode
Considered Multiple Products
Microsoft Defender for Cloud

No answer on this topic

SonarQube
Chose SonarQube
Sonar Qube doesn't do as good of a job of finding security vulnerabilities as dedicated SAST software, but it does more for code quality that the developers want to see. A comparison of Sonar Qube to something like Veracode or Fortify isn't apples to apples since they're not …
Chose SonarQube
SonarQube is more focused on code quality, whereas Veracode does a better job of finding security vulnerabilities. We lean towards SonarQube because we are looking for quality.
Chose SonarQube
Setting up with Azure devops is easier.
Scans results and depth of tweaking/whitelisting code snippets is easier with SonarQube.
Veracode
Chose Veracode
SonarQube is a great general code quality analyzer, and we do use it as a companion to Veracode. However, it's not security-focused and tends to have a higher false-positive rate for security issues it flags. It's also not as easy to generate reports from the findings unless …
Chose Veracode
SonarQube or Sonar Cloud focuses on scanning for coding good practice and code security is not covered as extensively as Veracode. SonarQube is free but required installation on an on-prem server. Subscription to Sonar Cloud (Saas version of Sonar Qube) is cheaper but does not …
Chose Veracode
Earlier in our organisation, Fortify was used (formerly from HP but now owned by Micro Focus). The general consensus was that there was too much noise (false positives), taking a lot of time to find and then fix the real issues.

SonarQube is also used in our organisation but not …
Chose Veracode
SonarQube is better at identifying code smells (code quality) but Veracode is better at identifying vulnerabilities when it comes to csharp.
Chose Veracode
I have used SonarQube for code quality and security analysis in the past, but Veracode's Software Composition Analysis analysis makes a big difference in terms of identifying vulnerabilities in dependencies. It would make it a lot easier if the IDE plugin could show the …
Chose Veracode
SonarQube doesn't have the required code scanning vulnerability detecting service.
Chose Veracode
Sonar cube was quicker, but not as thorough. Both integrated into our CI/CD pipeline, however the integration for Veracode is more straight forward.
Chose Veracode
SonarQube is faster and can be free, but the security scanning capabilities are a joke compared to Veracode.
Unlike SonarQube, Veracode goes deeper into finding a very wide variety of vulnerabilities and best practices that should be applied to software and provides reporting …
Chose Veracode
Veracode takes compiled code, so integration, regression based test cases can be evaluated well. Now, it has lot of features ranging from API sec to DAST, so have a code which is well working in live env is very essential to setup and hence giving us an edge over other tools. …
Chose Veracode
Veracode is slower with scan results however the flaws discovered and sites crawled are almost the same. Rapid7 InsightAppSec only does dynamic scans. Veracode did find more links on a site crawl. Rapid7 InsightAppSec has more out of the box reports than Veracode. Both …
Chose Veracode
Veracode is much better at uncovering security weaknesses and providing information and consulting. I use Veracode because our company decided for.
Chose Veracode
The maturity of the Veracode and the continuous improvements in its products it's one of the principal characteristics of chosee it, Veracode it's a SaaS platform and was born in the cloud, so this is a great option for our clients to be quick to implement also the easy of …
Chose Veracode
Once we learn how to use Veracode, its simple and very efficient tool to include in any of your devops environments like Dev, QA, Staging , UAT etc. The configuration is much simpler compared to others. The Enterprise license cost is also competitive compared to others. The …
Chose Veracode
Veracode has a very good integration within its products, which makes it easy for a developer. Veracode helps in providing support both actively and through resources on their platform to remediate and fix the issues found in one's application. The reporting section being …
Chose Veracode
Veracode stands out for trusted community results, vendor relationship, and partner channels to support and provide a close relationship.
Integration capacity is a good point when deciding to integrate with DevOps framework.
Chose Veracode
Veracode speaks on very practical, actual security issues rather than thousands of code quality issues.
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Defender for CloudSonarQubeVeracode
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Defender for CloudSonarQubeVeracode
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(56 ratings)
8.8
(35 ratings)
9.0
(136 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.9
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(8 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(2 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
7.3
(27 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(66 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Defender for CloudSonarQubeVeracode
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is very good at allowing users to see how their Azure environment is secure through the secure score. The recommendations are an excellent source of the controls that should be in place to ensure a secure environment. There needs to be more protection and features for data security.
Read full review
SonarSource Sarl
SonarQube is excellent if you start using it at the beginning when developing a new system, in this situation you will be able to fix things before they become spread and expensive to correct. It’s a bit less suitable to use on existing code with bad design as it’s usually too expensive to fix everything and only allows you to ensure the situation doesn’t get worse.
Read full review
Veracode
Veracode is well suited for development applications that can be made more secure right from the beginning. There is an excellent extension in Visual Studio that scans code from the IDE. However, it is less appropriate or incompatible with scanning SOAP or WSDL APIs. It supports only REST APIs.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • detect and respond to security threats in the cloud environment, reducing the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access.
  • The product assists our organization dealing with sensitive data in achieving and maintaining compliance with data protection rules.
  • The product provides real-time visibility into the cloud environment, offering insights into ongoing security activities.
  • It guarantees that security teams can actively handle possible threats by delivering real-time monitoring and notifications, reducing the impact on business operations.
Read full review
SonarSource Sarl
  • Detecting bugs and vulnerabilities: SonarQube can identify a wide range of bugs and vulnerabilities in code, such as null pointer exceptions, SQL injection, and cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. It uses static analysis to analyze the code and identify potential issues, and it can also integrate with dynamic analysis tools to provide even more detailed analysis.
  • Measuring code quality: SonarQube can measure a wide range of code quality metrics, such as cyclomatic complexity, duplicated code, and code coverage. This can help teams understand the quality of their code and identify areas that need improvement.
  • Providing actionable insights: SonarQube provides detailed information about issues in the code, including the file and line number where the issue occurs and the severity of the issue. This makes it easy for developers to understand and address issues in the code.
  • Integrating with other tools: SonarQube can be integrated with a wide range of development tools and programming languages, such as Git, Maven, and Java. This allows teams to use SonarQube in their existing development workflow and take advantage of its powerful code analysis capabilities.
  • Managing technical debt: SonarQube provides metrics and insights on the technical debt on the codebase, enabling teams to better prioritize issues to improve the quality of the code.
  • Compliance with coding standards: SonarQube can check the code against industry standards like OWASP, CWE and more, making sure the code is compliant with security and coding standards.
Read full review
Veracode
  • Veracode performs Static Application Security Testing (SAST) very well by finding flaws in the code using entry points so that it tests for everything a user can interact with in the application. This approach is very helpful for avoiding a lot of false positives early on.
  • Veracode performs SCA automatically on every SAST scan, so that we don't have to manually scan the application again for SCA scans.
  • Veracode integrates very well with the ticketing tools, so that it becomes very easy to track every finding and its status within our ticketing tool.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • The licensing structure could be better by providing possibilities for partial deployment in a subscription
  • The information in the dashboards are sometimes scattered, there should be a better overall view
  • Some parts of Defender for Cloud are expensive, some features should be moved to the standard capabilities of Azure
Read full review
SonarSource Sarl
  • Importing a new custom quality profile on SonarQube is a bit tricky, it can be made easier
  • Every second time when we want to rerun the server, we have to restart the whole system, otherwise, the server stops and closes automatically
  • When we generate a new report a second time and try to access the report, it shows details of the old report only and takes a lot of time to get updated with the details of the new and fresh report generated
Read full review
Veracode
  • Scan results stability: from one scan to another, additional flaws appear whereas code did not change.
  • Entry points selection: hard to be sure selection is optimal, should be automatized or hidden.
  • Branches management: we currently use sandboxes to scan different branches of our software. Would be good to have real branches management.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
It is a great product that integrates nicely when running an Azure platform and even multi-cloud environment. Not looking for point-solutions but a suite that answers most requirements. It is very comfortable being able to use KQL, workbooks and automation that is native to the azure platform
Read full review
SonarSource Sarl
No answers on this topic
Veracode
At this time, and we just renewed a month ago, I dont see any products out there overall that can offer what Veracode does. Yes, its not cheap by any means, but for the money its the best application security scanning tool out there.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
My visibility is limited because I'm only doing very small pieces of what the overall org does. And also, we have limitations on what we're allowed to use. It's not like we get a new product as users or leadership level users, and everything is on, and we can just do whatever we want. We're very restricted in what we can use any tooling within the org because of the different levels of regulatory constraints we have, because of just the nature of who we are inherently. So that's why. I don't think it's necessarily the product. I think it's more or less of what we're able to do with the product.
Read full review
SonarSource Sarl
It can improve in some user experience and usability parts, like the code view and the way we assign issues it's a bit hidden and not highlighted
Read full review
Veracode
- Almost no setup required and easy to configure - Very easy to use, intuitive UI with integrated analytics and learning portals. - Seamless to review the results, triage them, generate reports. - Security progression of the product/application is tracked via successive scans. - Privileges/Roles nicely fine grained and tightly controlled to let teams "view" only their products.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SonarSource Sarl
No answers on this topic
Veracode
Veracode has always been up and available to us.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SonarSource Sarl
No answers on this topic
Veracode
At this point, it runs well and mostly in a timely fashion. Dynamic scans take days but this may be a config issue still to be resolved.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SonarSource Sarl
We we easily able to integrate the SonarQube steps into our TFS process via the Microsoft Marektplace, we didn't have the need to call SonarQube support. We've used their online documentation and community forum if we ran into any issues.
Read full review
Veracode
Overall, Veracode support is helpful, community support is great, and documentation is available for self-service. Our Customer Success Manager is very helpful and reaches out regularly to see if we need assistance. We have not utilized many of the other resources offered by Veracode, however, in the future we would like to leverage secure coding training for our Development teams.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SonarSource Sarl
No answers on this topic
Veracode
We use it as a SAS service, so really just getting our teams to mold the use of Veracode into their SDLC has been a process of years in the making. It comes down to what your teams are ready and willing to accept and change. Management is key in getting their groups on board with using it regularly. If it doesnt have management backing, your security teams have little to no influence in getting this process off the ground fully.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is definitely the choice with the latest market trend and attacks that are currently happening. Microsoft has been able to safe guard a lot after the recent serious attacks happening globally in the digital world. There is a trust in this software and with the latest updates and machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud should be the choice.
Read full review
SonarSource Sarl
SonarQube is an open-source. It's a scalable product. The costs for this application, for the kind of job it does, are pretty descent. Pipeline scan is more secured in SonarQube. Its a very good tool and its support multiple languages. Its main core competency is of static code analysis and that is why SonarQube exists and it does it exceedingly well. The quality of scan on code convention, best practices, coding standards, unit test coverage etc makes them one of the best competent tool in the market
Read full review
Veracode
Veracode is slower with scan results however the flaws discovered and sites crawled are almost the same. Rapid7 InsightAppSec only does dynamic scans. Veracode did find more links on a site crawl. Rapid7 InsightAppSec has more out of the box reports than Veracode. Both integration to DevOps tools were striaghtforward.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SonarSource Sarl
No answers on this topic
Veracode
It meets our needs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • It simplifies security management and saves time. I'm not sure, but I'm very confident it saved me a couple of paychecks by centralizing the data I need to secure the cloud environment.
  • I also utilize the inventory overview to monitor my team's activities and verify they are following internal regulations, as well as cost overruns.
  • The recommendations can be utilized as a valuable instructional tool. I have the team explain why they are receiving them, why they are not following them, and what they are doing differently.
Read full review
SonarSource Sarl
  • Positive ROI from the standpoint of flagging several issues that would have otherwise likely been unaddressed and caused more time to be spent closer to launch
  • Slightly positive ROI from time-saving perspective (it's an automated check which is nice, but depending on the issues it finds, can take developers time to investigate and resolve)
Read full review
Veracode
  • Veracode's platform has had a very positive impact on our security posture, paving the path towards having coverage monitored automatically on hundreds of internal applications throughout the development lifecycle.
  • Veracode's platform has also had a very positive impact on improving the security knowledge of our development team, providing meaningful feedback as well as training options to reduce mitigation time and help to prevent flaws before they are created.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Screenshots

Screenshot of Remediation of critical issues in codeScreenshot of Cloud security benchmark mapped to industry FramworksScreenshot of Prioritization of critical risks with contextual threat analysisScreenshot of Workload protectionScreenshot of Unified DevOps VisibilityScreenshot of Visualizations to improve security posture proactively

SonarQube Screenshots

Screenshot of Projects.Screenshot of Static Application Security Testing.Screenshot of Software Composition Analysis.

Veracode Screenshots

Screenshot of a fixScreenshot of the Veracode PlatformScreenshot of SCAScreenshot of SCA Github