Microsoft Sentinel vs. Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Sentinel
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Sentinel (formerly Azure Sentinel) is designed as a birds-eye view across the enterprise. It is presented as a security information and event management (SIEM) solution for proactive threat detection, investigation, and response.
$2.46
per GB ingested
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator (formerly McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator) software centralizes and streamlines management of endpoint, network, data security, and compliance solutions.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft SentinelTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Editions & Modules
Azure Sentinel
$2.46
per GB ingested
100 GB per day
$123.00
per day
200 GB per day
$221.40
per day
300 GB per day
$319.80
per day
400 GB per day
$410.00
per day
500 GB per day
$492.00
per day
More than 500 GB per day
$492.00 + $98.40
per day/plus each additional 100 GB increment
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft SentinelTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft SentinelTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Features
Microsoft SentinelTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Sentinel
7.3
22 Ratings
7% below category average
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
-
Ratings
Centralized event and log data collection8.122 Ratings00 Ratings
Correlation7.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management7.122 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment flexibility7.020 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools6.920 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces7.222 Ratings00 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection5.918 Ratings00 Ratings
Data integration/API management6.820 Ratings00 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining6.718 Ratings00 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds7.620 Ratings00 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation7.619 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching7.820 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Sentinel
-
Ratings
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
6.6
1 Ratings
19% below category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Sentinel
-
Ratings
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
6.0
1 Ratings
32% below category average
IT Asset Realization00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Authentication00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Web Scanning00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft SentinelTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Small Businesses
AlienVault USM
AlienVault USM
Score 6.9 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InsightIDR
InsightIDR
Score 9.2 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
InsightIDR
InsightIDR
Score 9.2 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft SentinelTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(50 ratings)
7.0
(14 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.9
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(3 ratings)
8.2
(4 ratings)
Professional Services
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft SentinelTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
I think that the pro is well suited for a complex environment for a big organization that has people that has a mid-size cybersecurity team in place. And it's less appropriate if you are a not so big company because the budget could be important. Barrier to adopt it right on the right way
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
[McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator] seems to be better suited to large enterprise applications... I don't feel it really suits the or self-managed SMB market. The general joe is not going to understand how to wield this product to it's full potential. For those of us managing large networks, this is a very ideal product for managing multiple sites and users.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • I appreciate that it keeps the data within our, what we call our, authorization boundary. The fact that the data remains within Microsoft's, I guess, walled garden if you will, is very helpful for certain compliance needs in particular.
  • The large library of ingestion: ability to ingest is basically as easy as I can basically get it to be most of the time. There's occasionally some vendors that it's a little bit more challenging for, but given the ease of integration for a lot of things, basically it's become one of my requirements when I am looking at other tools is how easily do they integrate with Sentinel.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Static malware scans for known bad processes and files works well and can be schedules on endpoints easily
  • Preventing users from accessing USB drives and other peripherals is easily configured. We can also allow users to access to USB drives with user codes for the times they need it for business reasons.
  • ePO provides access into our MSME software so that we're not managing many different products from different locations.
  • In recent years the console has gotten much easier to navigate even though there is a ton of information to be accessed.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • I think it should include more third party integration with non microsoft products as well as with other cloud providers. These integrations should be native.
  • It should improve ML and AI capabilities.
  • I find its documentation a little bit difficult to understand at the start. So the words should be simple.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • It has a slow mechanism when adding custom threat feeds. For example, if McAfee didn't have a signature or detection about a new virus and we try to add it to our console it is like a really big process in adding that to our available signatures.
  • Whenever a scan is performed, the system CPU utilization goes up 100 percent.
  • Installation fails due to difference in timestamp when we try to shuffle between packages.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
The Microsoft Azure Sentinel solution is very good and even better if you use Azure. It's easy to implement and learn how to use the tool with an intuitive and simple interface. New updates are happening to always bring new news and improve the experience and usability. The solution brings reliability as it is from a very reliable manufacturer.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Azure Sentinel is very easy to use and configure. If you are stuck somewhere, Microsoft support is excellent in assisting and solving your issue.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
McAfee support is definitely GREAT! It is one of the best technical support on a business level. GOLD support is recommended to business. Their website is easy and quick to create a ticket. Their technical team usually responds right away with an email or call. Via call and web they provide a full and complete support until the issue is resolved. The best, most of the time they explain in detail what is the issue, the reason and how to resolve it.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Well before there was Microsoft Sentinel, you had other competing products like ArcSight or Splunk, et cetera. I think they have their own qualities, but the Microsoft integration story is really why we're using it.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
I have used Symantec Endpoint Encryption before. Symantec and EPO are both good in their own ways. EPO allows integration of other McAfee products. I have been using ePolicy Orchestrator for years. I have a lot of experience with the product. That is why I like it.
Read full review
Professional Services
Microsoft
Did not use professional services
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Log Management is a little difficult in-house as everything is situated on the cloud.
  • Paying according to the throughput of the data can be costlier for some organizations.
  • Excellent integration and log parsing for Microsoft products save many man-hours for the SIEM admin to focus on other things.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Peace of mind that your environment is safe and secure.
  • Keep your network environment up and running.
  • Additional resources (consulting or training) may be required if not familiar with the product.
  • Very complex to setup and configure ( training may be required).
  • Once configured, it will take care of almost 80% of your tasks.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Microsoft Sentinel Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Microsoft Sentinel Capabilities