TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Sentinel

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Sentinel (formerly Azure Sentinel) is designed as a birds-eye view across the enterprise. It is presented as a security information and event management (SIEM) solution for proactive threat detection, investigation, and response.

    $2.46

    per GB ingested

    Pricing
    Microsoft Sentinel
    Editions & Modules
    Azure Sentinel
    $2.46
    per GB ingested
    100 GB per day
    $123.00
    per day
    200 GB per day
    $221.40
    per day
    300 GB per day
    $319.80
    per day
    400 GB per day
    $410.00
    per day
    500 GB per day
    $492.00
    per day
    More than 500 GB per day
    $492.00 + $98.40
    per day/plus each additional 100 GB increment
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft Sentinel
    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft Sentinel
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Darktrace and Sentinel support each other well. We are using both of them.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Microsoft Sentinel is better for organizations that already use Microsoft products because it integrates easily with services like Microsoft Defender, Entra, and Microsoft 365.This provides a connected view of security alerts and makes investigation easier.Sentinel is also …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    I've used Google SIEM as well as Splunk. There's little things that they all do well, but I think where Microsoft Sentinel really shines is in its query language. We chose this because, again, it integrates well with the ecosystem. So we just went full E5 on the licenses, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    The Hunter SIM product, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk. That's all we've evaluated. Because we're a Microsoft shop, top tier.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Compared to platforms such as Splunk, LogRhythm, and Devo, Microsoft Sentinel’s cloud‑native, consumption‑based pricing model and reduced infrastructure overhead tend to offer better overall cost efficiency. This is especially true for organizations already invested in the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    These are all the Microsoft products. We have used Splunk. And again, I would say Microsoft Sentinel stacks up because it's a native tool that is more like an ecosystem. It's not a standalone tool. It's like if you're in the Microsoft stack, Microsoft Sentinel will stack up …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Microsoft Sentinel gave us the opportunity to move to pay as you go model. This allows us to determine the value of a log source rather than paying a flat rate for data ingested or hosting a server ourself.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Most of our landscape, both on prem and cloude, is based in Microsoft technologies, while the unification of tools implies some risk, decreasing the vendor levels simplify integrations, and by scale, help us to reduce costs too. Yes, the tool itself is a good contender, but the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    They are for different use cases, field effect helps us monitor network traffic and decide what to do with it while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence allows more robust monitoring and control over 365 variables such as emails that come in and out and Entra ID information.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Microsoft Sentinel feels on another different level from these solutions , all in the cloud . No need for troubleshooting , deployment or upgrades. Constant updates from the vendor and good support
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Microsoft Sentinel excels in cloud-native scalability, Microsoft ecosystem integration, and AI-driven threat detection with UEBA and Fusion rules, offering faster deployment and lower costs (48% cheaper per Forrester) than Splunk, QRadar, Exabeam, SentinelOne, Securonix, and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    We decided to go with Microsoft Sentinel because it works really well with Microsoft tools we are already using. Microsoft Sentinel's intelligent features detect and resolve problems more quickly than Sumo Logic. It also allows us to pay for what we use and grow as we need. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Well, primarily we use different stuff like CrowdStrike. We use different sign-on features. We primarily use those different products because we support a wider ecosystem.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Splunk, Google, SecOps. I look at how it stacks up based on the fact that it's the primary solution that we sell. So I think it stacks up really well. Why do we select it? Well, we selected it primarily because we're a very large Microsoft partner. The technology is very good …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Well before there was Microsoft Sentinel, you had other competing products like ArcSight or Splunk, et cetera. I think they have their own qualities, but the Microsoft integration story is really why we're using it.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    In my opinion, Microsoft Sentinel is much more reliable and Trustworthy. They are a bigger name with bigger scope of use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    We use intune to protect endpoints and we pull logs from all the endpoints through the intune connector into the Microsoft Sentinel SIEM and that way we can run rules on those logs to find anomalies.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    it is easy to use Microsoft Sentinel and has faster deployment and advanced artificial intelligence than splunk
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Elastic seems to have a much better interface for log search and is able to filter out noise. Microsoft Sentinel also appears to generate a lot of false positives.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Elastic is some carbon for various use cases. So because Elastic is a very, very wrong history in the market. So Sentinel is very recent for products from my understanding.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Well, we didn't select, we selected Sentinel for our Azure stuff, our Microsoft stuff, but we do use a different SIEM for the other stuff still.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Prior to using Sentinel, we were using Splunk specifically Splunk Enterprise Security and Splunk Cloud, so their on-prem and their cloud-based products. We switched originally for cost reasons, specifically cost control, but I have found that the ability to create reports, the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    We've used Splunk before, but it really is just pick your poison. They're all very similar.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Based on the overall infrastructure configuration that we have and also after analysing various solutions provided by Microsoft Sentinel, we came to a conclusion that the Microsoft Sentinel is the best option for us to help us in overall threat detection on our custom servers, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Sentinel
    Sentinel AI makes it a better choice. Also, its flexibility and customization make it a bit more costly than other competitors.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    99%
    Would buy again
    73 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    59 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    71 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    93%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    52 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    66 Answers
    Features
    Microsoft Sentinel
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Microsoft Sentinel
    Feature
    Microsoft Sentinel
    8.5
    34 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Centralized event and log data collection9.134 Ratings
    Correlation8.835 Ratings
    Event and log normalization/management8.435 Ratings
    Deployment flexibility8.333 Ratings
    Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools8.933 Ratings
    Custom dashboards and workspaces8.435 Ratings
    Host and network-based intrusion detection8.030 Ratings
    Data integration/API management8.433 Ratings
    Behavioral analytics and baselining9.031 Ratings
    Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds8.733 Ratings
    Response orchestration and automation8.232 Ratings
    Reporting and compliance management7.35 Ratings
    Incident indexing/searching8.733 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft Sentinel
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Security QRadar SIEM
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SolarWinds Security Event Manager (SEM)
    Score8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft Sentinel
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (74 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.5
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    8.2
    (27 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    Professional Services
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft Sentinel
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    What has really impressed me is how Microsoft Sentinel delivers centralised security monitoring across multiple data sources in our enterprise. It has reduced cost of handling large security logs by collecting and analyzing data without friction of managing traditional SIEM infrastructure. It is easy to work to integrate with Azure logs for quick data analysis.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • The visual presentation of data is terrific, so including what we had prior to Microsoft Sentinel, it presents data in a much more usable way, so that's been quite refreshing. It's not quite as complex to understand what you're looking at.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • One feature that I would like to see improved is probably the log parsing. I think one of the big things that Splunk does better than Microsoft Sentinel is that it makes it easy to bring in new log streams of arbitrary formats and parse them out into columns and tables. Microsoft Sentinel is a lot more involved, though. It takes a lot more manual work to bring in different log sources and parse them out.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    it does the job reasonably well
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    Mirosoft sentinel is easy to use once the inital setup is completed.The dashboard and centralized alerts make it simple to monitor security events and investigate incidents.Integration with other microsoft security tool is also helpful.Some advanced features and configurations can take time to understand, but overall it provides good, user-friendly security monitoring.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    Microsoft support is one of the highest rated on the market. It has global and multilingual support. Calls can be made over the phone and the solution is virtually instantaneous with the help of Microsoft engineers. It's great!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Compared to platforms such as Splunk, LogRhythm, and Devo, Microsoft Sentinel’s cloud‑native, consumption‑based pricing model and reduced infrastructure overhead tend to offer better overall cost efficiency. This is especially true for organizations already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem, where Sentinel can deliver strong capabilities with a lower total cost of ownership.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    Microsoft
    Did not use professional services
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • It's probably neutral. We see value, but it's, again, tick that kind of expense stuff. We're getting more insight and value into what is going on in that cloud workspace, but just noting the cost. So it's probably neutral. I'm not directly responsible, so the full kind of return on investment kind of cycle, that's someone else's problem. I'm like the end user. It's my team that will look at the data and look at the output of Microsoft Sentinel. So the ROI, someone else can worry about that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Microsoft Sentinel Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotScreenshot of Microsoft Sentinel Capabilities