Microsoft Stream vs. Sherpa Stream

Stream is good for recording and capturing discussion from meetings. I would say that it isnt appropriate where there is lots of detail and lots of varying topics discussed as the summarising tool can in these instances be too broad. It is really good where meetings have been left or missed; as the notes and transcript allow for easy catchup

Incentivized

• Records Meetings
• Transcribes voice to text
• Summarise discussed audio into concise notes

Incentivized

• Notes summarised could be more accurate
• Transcript could be more accurate with regional accents
• Sharing recordings could be slicker from Stream

Incentivized

Its integration into the Teams stack allows for ease of use without having to leave the application to access it elsewhere. Its interface is intuitive and easy to use. Sharing could be better. Transcripts and notes are very good

Incentivized

Consensus is better for lead generation and sharing marketing content; however, Stream is most appropriate for capturing meeting recordings when using teams. its integration flawlessly allows for such a slick process that using an external solution wouldn't

Incentivized

• Helps to solve disputes with clients on what was said in meetings
• Allows quick review of meetings without spending 2hrs re watching
• Sharing of notes helps collaboration internally

Incentivized