MobaXTerm vs. NoMachine Enterprise Desktop

Remote access to services and servers.

Possibility to install some necessary packages independently.

Remote access to several services like RemoteDesktop, ssh, ftp, telnet, VNC, and others.

Records the history of your input commands like in CLI. Managent of you key passwords.

Access clouds Shells like Amazon, Google, Microsoft and others.

Incentivized

If you just want to connect to the server and do work (like Linux server-workstation type), NoMachine Enterprise Desktop is great, except for the keyboard mapping issue, which you have to correct in a setup of the remote server (almost) every time you log on. The graphics are smooth and fast. Overall response speed is very good, too. I like it.

Incentivized

• Secure connection
• Fast response over internet
• Really look like you are sitting in front of the machine you are connecting.

Incentivized

• Keyboard mapping between client and host is often screwed up.
• Cut and paste between client and host is not convenient
• Would be nice if there was a function of simple file transfer between client and host

Incentivized

I haven't consulted with customer support, so I don't have an opinion. However, from the usefulness of the product, I think the support is also good

Incentivized

Again, the NoMachine is a real virtual terminal, and you don't need to install another Linux on your machine to fully exploit the X-terminal function. This makes the disk and memory usage of the client minimum. No issue on the screen. It is really good.

Incentivized

• It makes the access to server much easier and convenient
• Connection is very stable, which makes works very efficient
• I don't need to reboot my Windows PC to switch to Linux in order to fully exploit the working environment of the server.
• No negative impact

Incentivized