Mule ESB vs. Red Hat Fuse

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Mule ESB
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Mule ESB, from Mulesoft, is an open source middleware solution.N/A
Red Hat Fuse
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat Fuse (formerly Red Hat JBoss Fuse), based on open source communities like Apache Camel and Apache ActiveMQ, is part of an agile integration solution. Its distributed approach allows teams to deploy integrated services where required. The API-centric, container-based architecture decouples services so they can be created, extended, and deployed independently.N/A
Pricing
Mule ESBRed Hat Fuse
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Mule ESBRed Hat Fuse
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Mule ESBRed Hat Fuse
Considered Both Products
Mule ESB

No answer on this topic

Red Hat Fuse
Chose Red Hat Fuse
RedHat JBoss Fuse has a strong user community, it's fully opensource and it's easy to license with world-class support. It also has strong integration with AMQP messaging system to bring much more control and visibility over integration patterns, messaging flows, and the …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Mule ESBRed Hat Fuse
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Mule ESBRed Hat Fuse
Likelihood to Recommend
9.8
(5 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Mule ESBRed Hat Fuse
Likelihood to Recommend
Salesforce
If you’re bringing anything into Salesforce you should just invest now into Mule, you will get your money’s worth and find a myriad of uses to build APIs between many other systems. Once you build a component you can easily reuse it as a building block to attach to another source/destination. This makes it easy to ramp up quickly and spread usage of Mule throughout your enterprise. A good value for medium to large companies, but probably cheaper to outsource your job to a consulting firm if you are smaller.
Read full review
Red Hat
RedHat Jboss Fuse can be used perfectly to solve application integration or microservices implementation at the departmental or enterprise level. The wide quantity of connectors it provides allows any application to be integrated. Specific technical and programming knowledge is required to build the interfaces, therefore it is not so appropriate for those companies that do not have these employee profiles.
Read full review
Pros
Salesforce
  • It is best suited for Rest API development. Mule ESB uses RAML as an API descriptor which is less complex and easy to understand. RAML is an open standard majorly supported by Mulesoft. Once RAML is developed, it is very easy (a few clicks)to create flows corresponding to the resources defined in the RAML. One can also include JSON schema validation in RAML, and with the use of APIkit router, Mule ESB makes the request validation very easy (it's automatic basically.)
  • Mule ESB comes with a large spectrum of community and enterprise connectors. We have connectors for all the major platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Salesforce, SAP, etc. This enables Mule ESB to integrate with the other systems in a faster and more robust way. Mule ESB has many components to fulfill the requirements of each integration (for example batch processing, parallel processing, choice, etc.)
  • Mule API gateway is one of the best tools (modules) of Mulesoft's offering. It supports API governance and management very well. One can easily enforce policies on their APIs with API gateway. It enables some of the must-have features in an API solution (i.e. throttling, oAuth, access levels, etc.)
  • Implementing a CI/CD (DevOps) environment for Mule ESB is a very easy task. Mule majorly uses MAVEN as its build tool, which in turn makes it best suitable for CI/CD approach. Mule also provides MAVEN plugins for auto deployments to the servers. Mule also has a best Unit testing module which is MUnit. MUnit can be used for both Unit and Functional testing, and it is easy to write and generates coverage reports in various formats.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Hybrid deployment (on-premise, private or public cloud) deployed on OpenShift.
  • More than 200 connectors to connect practically everything.
  • Scalability
  • Pricing and Support
Read full review
Cons
Salesforce
  • Make sure to not over-engineer shared components. It can complicate development
  • Create a roadmap for where you are going - if not, you may miss components
  • I suggest getting support, otherwise it could be a difficult learning curve
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Better UI for drag and drop or no-coding integration.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Salesforce
It doesn't have API . We have to go for another API manager. But in Mule, it has both API manager and ESB
Read full review
Red Hat
RedHat JBoss Fuse has a strong user community, it's fully opensource and it's easy to license with world-class support. It also has strong integration with AMQP messaging system to bring much more control and visibility over integration patterns, messaging flows, and the overall system topology.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Salesforce
  • Overall a great tool for complex integrations
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Improve business process outcomes
  • Improve process agility
  • Reduce integration costs
  • Reduces operations and monitoring costs
Read full review
ScreenShots