NetApp StorageGRID vs. OVHcloud Public Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
StorageGRID
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
NetApp's StorageGRID is open S3 object store to manage your unstructured data at scale.N/A
OVHcloud Public Cloud
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
OVHcloud Public Cloud offers users a large number of cloud solutions that are billed on a pay-as-you-go basis. OVH states their infrastructure is set up in a simple way to enable businesses to harness the flexibility of on-demand resources to scale up from small projects to large-scale deployments.N/A
Pricing
NetApp StorageGRIDOVHcloud Public Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
StorageGRIDOVHcloud Public Cloud
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
NetApp StorageGRIDOVHcloud Public Cloud
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
NetApp StorageGRIDOVHcloud Public Cloud
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
NetApp StorageGRID
-
Ratings
OVHcloud Public Cloud
8.8
2 Ratings
8% above category average
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Dynamic scaling00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Elastic load balancing00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Pre-configured templates00 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Monitoring tools00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Pre-defined machine images00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Operating system support00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Security controls00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Automation00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
NetApp StorageGRIDOVHcloud Public Cloud
Small Businesses
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Score 9.7 out of 10
Linode
Linode
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Azure Blob Storage
Azure Blob Storage
Score 8.7 out of 10
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Azure Blob Storage
Azure Blob Storage
Score 8.7 out of 10
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
NetApp StorageGRIDOVHcloud Public Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
NetApp StorageGRIDOVHcloud Public Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
NetApp
The NetApp StorageGRID solution fits in perfectly with what our company was trying to accomplish. Our goal was to free up our expensive storage flash (SSD) capacity for our critical applications to allow for growth and added performance capabilities. I do not believe this solution would be greatly suited for those without a Cloud solution or secondary site/system to tier data.
Read full review
OVH
For demo uploads or for production uploads of companies from different sectors looking for a "general computing" cloud solution, I think that OVH can be a good provider. However, for more delicate or advanced loads or for specific solutions of, for example, AI, OVH has a wide margin for improvement.
Read full review
Pros
NetApp
  • Allows for very granular data tiering policies
  • Integrates seamlessly with our Cloud solution
  • Easy deployment
  • Easy to manage and adapt to a changing environment
Read full review
OVH
  • Price
  • Quality hardware
  • Quality network
  • Administrative tools
  • Range of products
Read full review
Cons
NetApp
  • Initial network design can be tedious
  • Provide more out-of-the-box ILM policies
  • Include professional services time with each purchase
Read full review
OVH
  • Technical support
  • Account support
  • Billing support
Read full review
Support Rating
NetApp
NetApp Support was able to quickly resolve a networking issue during the deployment of the NetApp StorageGRID system, which we, unfortunately, could not figure out on our own. Not only did Support engage quickly, but they also provided guidance on how to properly troubleshoot various issues such as the one we encountered and also provided excellent documentation.
Read full review
OVH
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
NetApp
We chose NetApp StorageGRID because we were not looking for a true backup solution but wanted the features to included a DR centric ideology. The IBM Cloud Backup solution was purely backup focused and did not fit the requirements for our needs. NetApp StorageGRID checked all of our boxes in regards to cost, use case, and ease of manageability.
Read full review
OVH
Most notably OVHcloud [Public Cloud] has dedicated servers which are a different breed of product than Linode's flagship VPS servers, the unfortunate fact of the matter is that OVHcloud [Public Cloud] can provide a fully-dedicated server at a lower price point than Linode's virtual server. Even worse than that is that with a dedicated server from [OVHcloud Public Cloud] there is zero chance of "cpu theft" (aka, noisy neighbor) which is a very real problem at Linode (we would require multiple migrations every year for servers hosted at Linode that were experiencing cpu theft). In addition to the improvement in quality for network/hardware at OVHcloud [Public Cloud] with their dedicated server offering, their VPS servers are also highly competitive against Linode's VPS servers - in the 2 years we've used OVHcloud [Public Cloud] VPS's we've had zero downtime associated with OVH actions such as host-node reboots or cpu theft or host node upgrades, a stark difference compared to Linode which regularly experiences those types of downtimes and many more on a very regular basis.
Read full review
Return on Investment
NetApp
  • Added Flash capacity
  • Decreased application latency
  • Decreased data storage costs
Read full review
OVH
  • Cost of virtual servers was reduced by 20% versus other VPS/Cloud providers.
  • Cost of dedicated servers was reduced by 50% versus other dedicated server providers.
  • Network speeds decreased considerably versus other providers.
  • Network quotas improved considerably versus other providers (unlimited at OVH).
  • Uptime has improved considerably which has improved client reputation.
Read full review
ScreenShots