Next.js vs. Remix.run

I love using Next.js — it's my go-to framework for new personal projects and work projects. The local development environment is quick, easy, and fun to use. The framework it uses, which puts an API that runs node in your pages subdirectory, is absolutely genius. No more middleware! It's good for quick projects and big projects alike. I wouldn't use Next.js if I did not want to heavily rely on serverless tech.

Incentivized

You will love to use remix if you love using React and Node. Be careful, read the docs first because Remix sometimes has its flavor to do the things you know. Remix is awesome for building Single Page Applications. But, if you want to have a REST API on your backend, probably you will struggle a little bit.

Incentivized

• Serverless API integration
• MDX (Markdown) Support
• Ease of Deployment via Vercel
• SSR React Pages

Incentivized

• Page loading
• Nested routes
• Parallel data loading

Incentivized

• Window sizing makes handling SSR pages odd, at times
• React can be easier to statically deploy
• Somewhat of a learning curve

Incentivized

• Request handling
• Lazy loading
• Only frontend third-party library integration

Incentivized

Next.js takes the best parts of React and applies them to a full-stack dev environment. With a built-in serverless API, it's easy to boot up a web application in under an hour. With easy integration with tools like Firebase, Supabase, Stripe, and countless others, Next.js is a perfect tool for getting your idea out into the real world.

Incentivized

We wanted to have a data-driven routed application, and an useful backend to handle request for other client apps later.

Incentivized

• It's free!
• It saves me a lot of time when writing serverless code
• Deployment, via Vercel, is fast, quick, and easy to debug

Incentivized

• Easy to build on
• Easy to use
• Be careful If a developer doesn't know React and Node

Incentivized