TrustRadius

NGINX Ingress Controller vs. SUSE Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
NGINX Ingress Controller
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
NGINX Ingress Controller is a traffic management solution for cloud‑native apps in Kubernetes and containerized environments.N/A
SUSE Security
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
SUSE® Security (formerly NeuVector) provides an end-to-end container security platform. This includes end-to-end vulnerability scanning and complete run-time protection for containers, pods and hosts.N/A
Pricing
NGINX Ingress ControllerSUSE Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
NGINX Ingress ControllerSUSE Security
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
NGINX Ingress ControllerSUSE Security
Considered Both Products
NGINX Ingress Controller
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose NGINX Ingress Controller
We are already using NGINX which is so reliable, it definitely lends weight to our decision to select NGINX Ingress Controller. Also, even though it is a little more complex to manage, NGINX Ingress Controller definitely have a richer feature set, better performance, caching, …
SUSE Security
Edgars Voroboks | TrustRadius Reviewer
Edgars Voroboks
Senior Information Technology Specialist
Chose SUSE Security
SUSE NeuVector is deployed on your Kubernetes, and data does not leave your data center. Sysdig is a cloud platform - you have no full control over what happens with your data. Also, SUSE NeuVector has a capability to prevent specific command execution ir containers, but Sysdig …
Features
NGINX Ingress ControllerSUSE Security
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
NGINX Ingress Controller
7.8
Ratings
4% below category average
SUSE Security
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
NGINX Ingress ControllerSUSE Security
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.8 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
NGINX Ingress ControllerSUSE Security
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
NGINX Ingress ControllerSUSE Security
Likelihood to Recommend
Best suited if we have to manage external traffic inside your Kubernetes cluster and want to use granular control to your applications.
AS
Amit Setia
Senior Engineer]
Read full review
overall experience so far is good with product and its features.good to have such product in the IT industry to go for it when it come to kubernetes-native container security platform it have the ability to have deep visibility into your network which is the critical part of run-time container security.
VINIT LAKHOTIYA | TrustRadius Reviewer
VINIT LAKHOTIYA
Windows and VMware System Administrator
Read full review
Pros
  • Provide access to containers
  • Manage traffic
  • Route traffic
  • Lightweight
  • Near to zero downtime
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • Scans containers software for known vulnerabilities
  • Denies command execution in containers
  • Prevents unwanted network connections from/to containers
Edgars Voroboks | TrustRadius Reviewer
Edgars Voroboks
Senior Information Technology Specialist
Read full review
Cons
  • Its not related to Ingress functionality but certificate management with cloud vendor would be a feature i would like to see.
AS
Amit Setia
Senior Engineer]
Read full review
  • I like everything about NeuVector. They are on the right development path.
Edgars Voroboks | TrustRadius Reviewer
Edgars Voroboks
Senior Information Technology Specialist
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We are already using NGINX which is so reliable, it definitely lends weight to our decision to select NGINX Ingress Controller. Also, even though it is a little more complex to manage, NGINX Ingress Controller definitely have a richer feature set, better performance, caching, traffic management among other features which was why it was chosen.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
SUSE NeuVector is deployed on your Kubernetes, and data does not leave your data center. Sysdig is a cloud platform - you have no full control over what happens with your data. Also, SUSE NeuVector has a capability to prevent specific command execution ir containers, but Sysdig does not have such ability. Sysdig is not an open-source solution, but SUSE NeuVector is.
Edgars Voroboks | TrustRadius Reviewer
Edgars Voroboks
Senior Information Technology Specialist
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Security is one of the best objective which we achieve with NGINX Ingress
  • Cost optimization is one of the business objective
AS
Amit Setia
Senior Engineer]
Read full review
  • We went from being blind to what happens in the Kubernetes network to seeing everything and being able to control Kubernetes network communications.
  • Now we are able to detect vulnerable containers faster.
Edgars Voroboks | TrustRadius Reviewer
Edgars Voroboks
Senior Information Technology Specialist
Read full review
ScreenShots