TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AMobile Security Framework (MobSF) is an automated, all-in-one mobile application (Android/iOS/Windows) pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. MobSF support mobile app binaries (APK, IPA & APPX) along with zipped source code and provides REST APIs for integration with CI/CD or DevSecOps pipeline. The Dynamic Analyzer helps you to perform runtime security assessment and interactive instrumented testing.N/A

    Tenable Vulnerability Management

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AVulnerability management specialist Tenable offers their cloud application and container security platform Tenable Web App Scanning (formerly Tenable.io), a vulnerability management tool that emphasizes visibility of web applications, automatic scanning, and a unified view of cloud infrastructure and possible inconsistencies indicating a vulnerability.N/A
    Pricing
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Tenable Vulnerability Management
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Tenable Vulnerability Management
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Tenable Vulnerability Management
    Considered Both Products
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    Tenable
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Tenable Vulnerability Management
    Threat Intelligence
    Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) and Tenable Vulnerability Management
    Feature
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    -
    Ratings
    Tenable Vulnerability Management
    8.4
    2 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Network Analytics00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Threat Recognition00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings4.02 Ratings
    Threat Analysis00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
    Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management Tools
    Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) and Tenable Vulnerability Management
    Feature
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    -
    Ratings
    Tenable Vulnerability Management
    8.8
    2 Ratings
    6% above category average
    IT Asset Realization00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Authentication00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Web Scanning00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Tenable Vulnerability Management
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Metasploit
    Score9 out of 10
    Tenable Nessus
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Metasploit
    Score9 out of 10
    Tenable Nessus
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Tenable Vulnerability Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Tenable Vulnerability Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    MobSF is good for checking for vulnerabilities in your app. It will also give suggestions on how to address them. Another thing is can do is find code that may be incorrect. It is not, however, a substitute for a system that actually checks your code for proper use. It really is concentrated on security.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tenable
    I've been using this product since it began as an open source product, I really like it and for the money, I think it's probably the best choice for most companies who need a product like this. Over the years I've seen the interface change quite a bit and sometimes I think it's a bit unclear how to do certain things and the different packages can be confusing, these are the only reasons I'm giving it a 9 instead of a 10.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • Scan for vulnerabilities
    • Scan for bad coding
    • Give suggestions on fixes for security issues
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tenable
    • Setup of the internal scanner was fairly simple and straight forward.
    • An update came out for the internal scanner that allows you to add an Internal Certificate Authority for lookup.
    • Has automated reporting to keep executives and compliance departments informed.
    • Internal scanner can be configured to auto-update itself.
    • "Recast Rules" allows your organization to redefine a vulnerabilities' classification, if it is not applicable or your disagree.
    • External PCI scans allow you to remediate before submitting to Tenable.io for review.
    • Tenable.io staff was very patient and helpful. They provided some limited guidance with remediation.
    • Internal and External scans can be automated. schedule for the automated scans is very granular.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • The UI is not that user friendly
    • The documentation could be easier to understand
    • An easier method of deploying MobSF would be appreciated
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tenable
    • Expensive - You do pay a slight premium for the best product in the space.
    • Asset management is difficult to work with if you have a lot of asset turnover, the license can be ''held'' for 3-6 months after the asset is gone from your environment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Tenable
    We like to renew tenable each year we have had it so far.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Tenable
    Overall it is good, it took a little while to understand it and figure things out but once you have a good grasp on it then, it is very good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Tenable
    Support is usually really great at walking you through any steps you need to take when you get stuck on something. There are a few false positives and errors that have come up over the years that required their help to get through. Unfortunately, the steps required to diagnose some problems are more tedious than I think should be necessary. (IE: SQL instances can throw errors that clog up your logs because one plugin affects it in a certain way. The process to diagnose this is to watch timestamps of plugins in a log while monitoring the SQL logs at the same time and using your best guess as to what is causing it.)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    In my opinion, MobSF is not as comprehensive as SonarQube. Both, however, do a very good job in scanning your code for vulnerabilities. Both do roughly the same things. The reports of SonarQube are more detailed though. The advantage that MobSF has over SonarQube is the price. One is free while the other is a paid solution (with several tiers). However, we use them together to get a more comprehensive scan.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tenable
    Tenable.io has a comparable set of features, with excellent support and a competitive price. After less than desirable experiences with another company, we moved to Tenable and haven't looked back since.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • It has allowed our apps to pass a security vetting requirement of a third party to deploy our app
    • We can see where we can improve on the development of our app
    • The deployment can take a while, especially with teams not familiar with the software
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tenable
    • Since this is a requirement for our PCI compliance and the cost is relatively low, the ROI isn't really something we need to think too much about, Tenable's pricing is fair and affordable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots