OpenText Information Archiving vs. Smarsh

OpenText archive center is much appreciated with Data retention and encryption. Less appreciated when if you need to make changes to the system every time we need technical support from OpenText.

Incentivized

This appliance is well suited for organizations that have a need to monitor, moderate, or log social networking site use or the use of any website. It is a very solid tool for any information security department to have at their disposal.

Incentivized

• Data archival
• Data encryption
• Cloud availability

Incentivized

• Discovery: It allows for easy discoveries by the compliance and cyber security departments.
• Ethical walls: This keeps certain departments from talking to each other.
• Very granular control. This is a big product meaning you can get very detailed with it.
• Once it's configured and running, we hardly ever have any issues.

Incentivized

• Product functionality and performance
• Cost managment

Incentivized

• Its configuration options were very large and required a good deal of time to learn all of the various settings.

Incentivized

It's the only product at this time that meets all of our requirements.

Incentivized

I am not sure about this decision, it has been taken by our IT department.

Incentivized

This was the only appliance of its kind that I have used. Other devices have different capabilities for web filtering such as the checkpoint firewalls, but none of them offered the overall solution that was deployed with this product at that time.

Incentivized

• Dependability on OpenText in terms of technical support
• Stability and reliability

Incentivized

• Faster investigative work has led to increased employee efficiency when working on security investigations.

Incentivized