OpenText Core Share vs. SpiderOak One Backup

OpenText Core Share

1 Reviews and Ratings

SpiderOak One Backup

4 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
OpenText Core Share	Score8 out of 10	N/A	OpenText Core Share is an cloud-based file sync and share solution supporting collaboration, featuring Office 365 integration, and 2FA. The product integrates with OpenText's ECM solutions.	N/A
SpiderOak One Backup	Score8.8 out of 10	N/A	SpiderOak is a file sync and cloud storage / backup solution, emphasizing privacy.	$6 per month per user

Pricing

OpenText Core Share

SpiderOak One Backup

No answers on this topic

150 GB: $6
per month per user
400 GB: $11
per month per user
2 TB: $14
per month per user
5 TB: $29
per month per user

Pricing Offerings
OpenText Core Share	SpiderOak One Backup
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

No setup fee

—

—

Best Alternatives
	OpenText Core Share	SpiderOak One Backup
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	IDrive Online Backup and Object Storage e2 Score9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	No answers on this topic	Apple iCloud Score8.4 out of 10
Enterprises	No answers on this topic	ownCloud Score9.2 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	OpenText Core Share	SpiderOak One Backup
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	OpenText Core Share	SpiderOak One Backup
Likelihood to Recommend	OpenText OpenText Core Share is a great tool for storing files and collaborating. It makes for a great collaboration tool. It's easy to track changes, enable or disable access to others, and works directly from browser. It needs some improvisations in terms of speed and consistency. Overall, it's a great tool for small teams to work together. Incentivized Sandeep Reyyi Senior Development Engineer Testing Read full review	SpiderOak No answers on this topic
Pros	OpenText Integration with Office 365 apps. Sharing files externally is easy. Version history. Folder structure is well organised. Incentivized Sandeep Reyyi Senior Development Engineer Testing Read full review	SpiderOak No answers on this topic
Cons	OpenText Drag and drop feature needs to be optimised. No inbuilt backup tool. Desktop app sync needs to improved and quick. Incentivized Sandeep Reyyi Senior Development Engineer Testing Read full review	SpiderOak No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	OpenText Nothing. OpenText Core Share is our only choice. Incentivized Sandeep Reyyi Senior Development Engineer Testing Read full review	SpiderOak No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	OpenText Increased productivity. Collaboration between teams. Secure way to share files. Incentivized Sandeep Reyyi Senior Development Engineer Testing Read full review	SpiderOak No answers on this topic
ScreenShots