OpenText Dimensions CM vs. Yarn

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Dimensions CM
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Dimensions CM is Software Change and Configuration Management for Agile development, developed by Serena Software and now sold by OpenText.N/A
Yarn
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Yarn is a package manager for JavaScript designed to provide secure dependency management, with project manager features such as offering a workspace that allows users to split projects into sub-components within a single repository. Developed by personnel at Facebook, Yarn is free and open source and associated to no company.N/A
Pricing
OpenText Dimensions CMYarn
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Dimensions CMYarn
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Dimensions CMYarn
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
OpenText Dimensions CMYarn
Small Businesses
Salt
Salt
Score 7.2 out of 10
Salt
Salt
Score 7.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Salt
Salt
Score 7.2 out of 10
Salt
Salt
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.3 out of 10
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Dimensions CMYarn
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Dimensions CMYarn
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Serena CM is well suited to highly controlled, audited, and process driven environments. It will allow strict segregation of duties, and change traceability. If implemented correctly it will help you quickly build trusts with your auditors. It is also well suited to environments that require constant branching and merging. Due to the complexity of the product and learning curve for your development and operations team it may be overkill in a small shop with loose rules
Read full review
Open Source
There is really no real reason why not to use Yarn today. It's much faster than npm, and you will need a dependency management system anyway. The only thing that might be missing is the fact that it doesn't come natively with NodeJS, and you have to install it yourself. I'd like to see the NodeJS ecosystem include Yarn by default.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Code Promotion: Dimensions CM allows supervisors to control changes to code, in that they delegate requests to developers, and act as a gatekeeper prior to promoting to the next environment. This functionality is configurable so you can set up a workflow that best fits the structure and requirements of your own company.
  • Code Repository for changes and versioning: Code can be checked out by item or by synchronizing folders. Code revisions can be compared against other revisions or work files. Item histories show which developers made which modifications, and which supervisor and operations personnel were involved in assigning the request and promoting the code to each environment. Additionally a pedigree will show a stream diagram which graphically displays branches and merges.
  • Deployment: Serena Change Management offers help automating deployment including integrations with SVN and Jenkins. Its newer versions also have a powerful graphical deployment automation tool (Serena Deployment Automation- SDA). It comes with a certain amount of licenses built-in. If you have a many nodes to deploy to there will be separate licensing costs for that.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Package management
  • Speed of download compared to npm
  • Moduel version control
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • The only major negative that I have encountered with Serena CM product is that the very power and flexibility of the tool means there is a risk that you will make a mess of things. In other words it gives you plenty of rope to tangle yourself with. I recommend careful, well thought out deployments implementing the built in roles and workflows that can be turned on and configured, using a consistent methodology.
  • My experience with the Serena help desk support has not been impressive. Though reasonably polite and diligent, the technicians were well trained, and often gave bad advise and terrible scripts. On several occasions I had to rewrite scripts they have me; if I had run them as provided they would have caused even more difficulties than the problem I was trying to solve. I speak of the support in the past tense because I conditioned myself not to call them, it was usually just easier to solve nay problems my self. They do have a good account management team though, and for any major issues you can go thru them.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Rarely, some server connection error appear, while npm works alright.
  • Sometimes, deleting the whole vendor directory is the best solution to solve weird issues.
  • You still might need npm to install Yarn.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
Serena CM is superior to Microsoft Team Foundation Server (TFS) in overall functionality, but does not have very good native integration with Microsoft. Therefore in a Microsoft centric shop with no audit needs ,TFS would be better. Otherwise I would choose Serena CM
Read full review
Open Source
Compared to npm, Yarn is a clear winner here. npm does not look to be getting any improvements recently. And it's much much slower to run when installing project dependencies. This has a clear impact on the developer productivity but also makes deployments slower. So Yarn is still a much superior choice.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • Serena has facilitated our annual completion of various audit and technology control certifications. These certifications make a huge difference to our company's reputation and bottom line.
  • There has been no negative impact on our company.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Deployments happen much faster.
  • Building and testing our apps is much more streamlined and efficient.
  • Makes it easier to write reusable code.
Read full review
ScreenShots