Fortify by OpenText vs. StackHawk

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Fortify by OpenText
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
An AppSec solution formerly from Micro Focus, spanning SCA, SAST and DAST that supports the breadth and management of any application portfolio, used to secure code. Features API discovery and testing for any application, throughout the software lifecycle.N/A
StackHawk
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
StackHawk is a solution designed to make it simple for developers to find, triage, and fix application security bugs, from the company of the same name headquartered in Denver. Scan an application for AppSec bugs in the code, triage and fix with provided documentation, and automate in the development pipeline to prevent future bugs from hitting production.
$42
per month per developer
Pricing
Fortify by OpenTextStackHawk
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Pro
$42
per month per developer
Enterprise
$60
per month per developer
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fortify by OpenTextStackHawk
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—*5 Developer Minimum
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
Fortify by OpenTextStackHawk
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Fortify by OpenTextStackHawk
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Fortify by OpenTextStackHawk
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
SDLC deployment is simple. simple to use The coverage is thorough and complete as a DAST product.
Read full review
StackHawk
No answers on this topic
Pros
OpenText
  • Detection of vulnerabilities
  • Scanning pipelines
  • Integration is super easy
  • Scanned cloud based applications
Read full review
StackHawk
No answers on this topic
Cons
OpenText
  • Reporting could be better
  • Can be an involved setup if your organization is not using common build tools
  • Users get spammed with a lot of email updates from the service
Read full review
StackHawk
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
Since every firm needs to perform static code analysis on their applications, I believe Micro Focus Fortify WebInspect would work well for them (they also offer dynamic scanning, although I haven't used it myself). Different static analysis tools scan code in different ways, and Micro Focus Fortify WebInspect asks you to submit a complete build of the application along with debugging files. Depending on how your company builds its apps, this requirement may be simple or challenging.
Read full review
StackHawk
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
OpenText
Always receive excellent support from the vendor. No issues there.
Read full review
StackHawk
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
Fortify Application Defender is a little more timely and upfront with a lot of their information on cyber security. we like what they provide and how they communicate with our users. I think they have a good understanding and practice in their field. they seem best suited for us and the best fit.
Read full review
StackHawk
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • DevSecOps helped in reducing efforts
  • License cost was less
  • We could roll out double the count of applications with implementation of WebInspect
Read full review
StackHawk
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots