TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web (formerly UFT Mobile) vs. PeakoQ

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web (formerly UFT Mobile)

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web (formerly UFT Mobile and formerly from Micro Focus), is a centralized lab of real mobile devices and emulators. With remote access, developers and testers can develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize mobile apps from anywhere.N/A

    PeakoQ

    N/AN/APeakoQ is a performance testing platform for QA, engineering, and DevOps teams. It supports the creation, execution, maintenance, and reporting of API load and performance tests. Users can import API collections and definitions from sources such as Postman, Swagger/OpenAPI, and cURL. PeakoQ uses AI to generate JMeter and k6 performance test scripts that teams can review, customize, and run. The platform also supports Docker-based deployment, multi…N/A
    Pricing
    OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web (formerly UFT Mobile)PeakoQ
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web (formerly UFT Mobile)PeakoQ
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web (formerly UFT Mobile)PeakoQ
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Tricentis NeoLoad
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Tricentis NeoLoad
    Score8.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web (formerly UFT Mobile)PeakoQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web (formerly UFT Mobile)PeakoQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    UFT mobile works really well if/when you need physical devices under your management. Managing physical devices in any setup is an interesting undertaking due to the various considerations per device. There are really nice best practices, for example using managed USB switches like the one from Cambrionix, that can help make for a really good experience. For us, we only have 1 application at this time that has frequent updates/releases. We are able to test out these with confidence using our suite of real/on-campus devices managed and made available by the UFT Mobile product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quarks Technosoft
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Remote access to real devices within your organization network as compared to public devices library offering, where their is a risk of exposing pre-production builds outside the organization.
    • "Factory built like" integration with HP ALM, HP Sprinter, HP UFT and HP Network Virtualization.
    • Ability to mimic real world conditions in a controlled environment in the devices of your choice.
    • Removed the guess work out of using emulators
    • Able to extend automation to mobile testing using HP UFT.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quarks Technosoft
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    OpenText
    • Most of our problems are with the lengthy onboarding process with iOS devices.
    • Occasionally Android devices will disconnect themselves.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quarks Technosoft
    No answers on this topic
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    The tool continues to meet our expectations and has shown that they are continually evolving the product with new features that benefit us. The most recent new feature was the auto-signing/packaging of iOS apps from the server to allow native interaction of features like biometrics. Prior this was a lengthy exercise.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quarks Technosoft
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    HP Mobile Center stacks well against solutions like Mobile Labs Device Connect, Perfecto Mobile and Device Anywhere. Its native integration with HP ALM and HP UFT makes it a clear choice for team already using those solutions. HP Mobile Center also provides extension to Amazon Device Library.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quarks Technosoft
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Efficient use of the devices. Reduced the idle time.
    • Better control over access and user management. Testing within our controlled environments.
    • Better control of device matrix.
    • Faster testing cycles. Early design bugs to development teams. Real devices means, less guess work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quarks Technosoft
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots

    PeakoQ Screenshots

    Screenshot of PeakoQ 1Screenshot of PeakoQ 2