TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText UFT One vs. Opkey (now with pCloudy)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText UFT One

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AUnified Functional Testing (UFT, formerly known as HP UFT and before that QuickTest Professional or HP QTP) is a functional and performance testing tool acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, now from OpenText.N/A

    Opkey

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AOpkey (now with pCloudy) is a mobile app testing platform for performing manual as well as automated testing on more than 5,000 device-browser combinations hosted on the cloud. It provides hosts of other services like bot testing and in-field user experience testing. Opkey provides On-Premise, Private and Public device cloud solutions, which enterprises can choose from based on their needs. With rising digital spectrum, it now offers a complete digital assurance platform where testing…N/A
    Pricing
    OpenText UFT OneOpkey
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText UFT OneOpkey
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText UFT OneOpkey
    Small Businesses
    TestComplete
    Score8 out of 10
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    ReadyAPI
    Score6 out of 10
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SoapUI Open Source
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText UFT OneOpkey
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (12 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText UFT OneOpkey
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    UFT is well suited if the price is not an issue, and if the requirement is about testing different technologies. If the application is based on Legacy platforms like Siebel or Mainframe, UFT fares quite well. For low cost web-based projects, there are other cheap and open source tools available. If it is about API testing or Mobile Testing, it is better to use other tools like TOSCA.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Opkey
    pCloudy is a niche player in mobile qa automation space with extremely good support system.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • The simple front end will allow novice users to easily grasp the basics of automation and give them confidence to try things for themselves.
    • UFT can scale up and run across multiple machines from a single controller, such as ALM, enabling hundreds of tests to be executed overnight.
    • There is an active support community out there, both official HPE based and independent users. This means if you do encounter a problem there is always someone out there to help you.
    • The later versions have many add-ins to plug in to other tools within the QA world.
    • Expert users are able to utilise the many native functions and also build their own to get the most out of the tool and impress people as they walk past and see the magic happening on the screen.
    • UFT also has LeanFT bundled with it, allowing automated testing at the api level - if you can convince the developers to let you in there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Opkey
    • Physical devices over cloud.
    • Very good support system.
    • Good integration with open source tool set.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • Its licensing cost is very high making it a very expensive tool. due to this many organisations are exploring options of license free tools like Selenium for automation. Though learning curve is large in case of Selenium but it is very cost effective & you an get lot of support online for Selenium.
    • Though the scripting time is less since its easy to create automation scripts, the execution time is relatively higher as it takes the lot of CPU & RAM.
    • Though UFT is quite stable but during long execution cycles we do get frequent browser crashing issues.
    • In terms of costing TestComplete is also one option which is not free but comes with modular pricing. You can buy what you need, when you need.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Opkey
    • Platform slowness
    • Additional capabilities wrt automation
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    OpenText
    The ui is clean but there are lots of setting snd options which one must be fully aware so it will aid him/her during scripting
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Opkey
    Extremely good UI and the learning curve is very [small].
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    HPE are quick to reply and it's possible to get through to the actual developers shuold the case warrent it. Their online system allows updates and tracking of all incedents raised.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Opkey
    Extremely good support system and I have a personal experience wherein we needed support and they provided a dedicated person to resolve the issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    1. It works solid for automate SAP and S/4 Hana applications and Fiori too. 2. Teams are well versed about UFT One 3. Able to handle maintained execution results 4. Publish Automation execution results in well manner to the leadership team/stake holders 5. More help content available 6. Able to understand non technical resources about normal view.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Opkey
    pCloudy is a niche player in mobile test automation area and provides a wide variety of devices over cloud. They have a pretty good support system which compliments the platform even better.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Reduces the total workload of keeping the team to test older (regression) functionality. QA testers can concentrate on ad-hoc and exploratory testing, saving time and effort across the entire project.
    • Has built a better infrastructure for the client applications on which we can rely on for stability and providing regression results for any new features being developed.
    • Led the applications a step closer to implementing agile practices and DevOps across the entire organization. Thus, providing a better turnaround time of new features to the customers and less maintenance headaches for the BAU team to address.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Opkey
    • Saved a lot of investment in procuring physical devices.
    • Since the setup is over cloud, we did not procure devices in multiple locations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Opkey Screenshots

    Screenshot of pCloudy