Overleaf vs. TextPad

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Overleaf
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Overleaf is a collaborative writing and publishing system designed to make the process of producing academic papers much quicker for both authors and publishers, from Writelatex Limited in London.N/A
TextPad
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
TextPad is a free and open source general purpose plain text file editor, for Windows.N/A
Pricing
OverleafTextPad
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OverleafTextPad
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OverleafTextPad
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
OverleafTextPad
Small Businesses
BBEdit
BBEdit
Score 8.2 out of 10
BBEdit
BBEdit
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Vim
Vim
Score 9.7 out of 10
Vim
Vim
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Vim
Vim
Score 9.7 out of 10
Vim
Vim
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OverleafTextPad
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(2 ratings)
8.4
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
OverleafTextPad
Likelihood to Recommend
Digital Science
Overleaf is good to use in a lot of scenarios where something is to be written as a group. However, I believe that it is only good up to a certain amount of people working on the document at once. While I am unsure when it becomes too much, I got no doubt that there is a limit for when it is that good. Though normally, our group size of up to six people has been fine to work with in Overleaf.
Read full review
Open Source
I like the macro feature for transforming text. For example, taking a CSV file of data and quickly turning it into a set of SQL "insert" statements. Also, useful for this is the find/replace feature using regular expressions such as taking a URL QueryString and breaking all the parameters into separate lines and perhaps sorting them for review.
Read full review
Pros
Digital Science
  • Easy to get started and compile documents
  • Collaborative scientific writing
  • Latex documentation
  • Built in templates
  • Comments and chat features
Read full review
Open Source
  • Quick to load.
  • Very fast searching algorithm for finding and replacing text.
  • Macros are very useful.
Read full review
Cons
Digital Science
  • New user friendliness
  • More concise error messages
  • Layout
Read full review
Open Source
  • I would like a "delete non-bookmarked lines" so I can skip the "invert bookmarks" step.
  • The "Compare Text Files" could be streamlined to compare text in 2 tabs without going through the save steps.
Read full review
Support Rating
Digital Science
No answers on this topic
Open Source
I never had to use support, so I can't answer this. I would hope that it is good though.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Digital Science
Overleaf promotes collaboration and has much better scientific formatting, which makes it great for research papers. It allows for much smoother and more professional looking documents, with easy to change and configure formatting. It is very difficult to insert mathematical formulas and long complex derivations in Microsoft Word, and formatting in Microsoft Word is also very finicky.
Read full review
Open Source
When you want to quickly edit a file, TextPad starts up quickly and has many features over Microsoft Notepad. Visual Studio Code is an alternative in that it is full-featured and will edit text files but is slower at startup. I prefer the macro feature in TextPad due to its simplicity.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Digital Science
  • Easier teamwork
  • Better looking reports
  • Better overview over document
Read full review
Open Source
  • Made my job easier, so I would say it had a positive return on investment. Especially for it's overall low cost.
Read full review
ScreenShots