Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	AutoFocus™ contextual threat intelligence service, from Palo Alto Networks, accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.	N/A
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform	Score 8.3 out of 10	N/A	TI Ops is the threat intelligence platform built for operations, not just centralization. It ingests hundreds of internal and external sources, enriches them with AI, and aligns them to any intelligence requirements and MITRE ATT&CK gaps. Analysts can operationalize insights across the SOC, IR, hunt, and vulnerability teams. When combined with Polarity and Risk Quantifier, TI Ops helps teams act on intelligence faster and focus on the threats that truly matter to the…	N/A

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus	ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	Yes

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus	ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform

Features

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform

Threat Intelligence

Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
	Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus - Ratings	ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform 7.1 3 Ratings 2% below category average
Network Analytics	00 Ratings	6.42 Ratings
Threat Recognition	00 Ratings	6.93 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification	00 Ratings	6.62 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting	00 Ratings	8.53 Ratings
Threat Analysis	00 Ratings	6.53 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting	00 Ratings	7.83 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus	ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform
Small Businesses	Egnyte Score 9.4 out of 10	Egnyte Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus	ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (4 ratings)	8.5 (3 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	7.3 (2 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus	ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform
Likelihood to Recommend	Palo Alto Networks Analytics, Threat Hunting and detailed investigations for the security incidents are the main use cases. Automation on the cloud based on the feeds through the minemeld is another use case. When you deploy PAN on perimeter, Autofocus gives you a temendaous value. If you have non PAN firewall/products running Auto focus doe not make sense. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	ThreatConnect If ThreatConnect is going to be used to create playbooks the required technical knowledge and try and error that is required may not be for everyone. The application provides an app builder capability that is really useful but in order to be used the user needs to have intermediate to advanced programing abilities. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Palo Alto Networks Threat intelligence Emerging Threats Intelligence feeds Incentivized Randy Varela Security Engineer Read full review	ThreatConnect One of the most beneficial features of the ThreatConnect is its ability to automatically enrich IOCs from multiple sources such as VT WHOis and assign a dynamic threat score. Incentivized Harshal Pachpande Analyst Read full review
Cons	Palo Alto Networks third party product integration simplicity of the managment console integration to cortex agents directly Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	ThreatConnect Need to have more native (out of the box) integrations Need more focused training courses and certificates Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	Palo Alto Networks No answers on this topic	ThreatConnect The platform is feature rich in enrichment and multi tenant management additionally have the ease of the use for new analysts or smaller teams. Incentivized Harshal Pachpande Analyst Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Palo Alto Networks If you have Palo Alto, autofocus is the selected choice. If you have Checkpoint than the threat cloud. Price of autofocus is much cheaper. Unit42 is the real differentiator. Minemeld is unique to PAN and working perfectly. Search outputs and are detailed and gives lots of data. Integration with SOAR is much easier with autofocus. Indicator list is huge. Tagging works magnificent. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	ThreatConnect As ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform has a ready HTTP Client App, we can virtually integrate it with any system that supports REST APIs. This gives great room for integration and automation that is not found on other systems. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Palo Alto Networks Cheap for us Easy integration Easy management Incentivized Randy Varela Security Engineer Read full review	ThreatConnect Playbooks allow for extensive automation of tasks the team would otherwise spend hours on Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots		ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform Screenshots