Picus Security vs. Securonix Next-Generation SIEM
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Picus Security | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | Picus Security, headquartered in San Francisco, offers Continuous Security Validation and Mitigation as the most proactive approach to ensure cyber-resilience. The Picus Platform measures the effectiveness of defenses by using emerging threat samples in production environments, providing the insight required to build the right security strategy to better manage complex operations. | N/A |
Securonix Next-Generation SIEM | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Securonix headquartered in Addison offers the Securonix Next-Generation SIEM deployment, combining log management as well as user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA), for a complete SOC solution. | N/A |
| Picus Security | Securonix Next-Generation SIEM | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Picus Security | Securonix Next-Generation SIEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | |
| Picus Security | Securonix Next-Generation SIEM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Picus Security | Securonix Next-Generation SIEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM Security QRadar SIEM Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | SolarWinds Security Event Manager (SEM) Score8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Picus Security | Securonix Next-Generation SIEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.4 |
| Professional Services | - | 9.1 |
| Picus Security | Securonix Next-Generation SIEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
| |
| Professional Services | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |


