Plixer Scrutinizer vs. Qualys VMDR
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Plixer Scrutinizer | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | Plixer is a developer of network management software with a focus on network traffic analysis, network security, threat detection and network optimization, headquartered in Kennebunk, Maine. Plixer Scrutinizer collects, analyzes, visualizes, and reports on data from every network conversation and digital transaction to deliver security and network intelligence. | N/A |
Qualys VMDR | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | Qualys VMDR 2.0 with TruRisk gives enterprises visibility and insight into cyber risk exposure with the goal of making it easy to prioritize vulnerabilities, assets, or groups of assets based on business risk. Security teams can take action to mitigate risk, helping the business measure its true risk, and track risk reduction over time. | N/A |
| Plixer Scrutinizer | Qualys VMDR | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Plixer Scrutinizer | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 86% Would buy again 6 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| Plixer Scrutinizer | Qualys VMDR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plixer Scrutinizer | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA) Score8.5 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA) Score8.5 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Plixer Scrutinizer | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 9.6 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 8.4 |
| Availability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Configurability | - | 9.0 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 9.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 9.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 9.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 8.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.0 |
| Plixer Scrutinizer | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
|
|
| Pros | ![]()
|
|
| Cons | ![]()
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | ![]()
|
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | ![]()
|
|
| ScreenShots |



