PractiTest vs. Zephyr Enterprise

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
PractiTest
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
PractiTest is presented as a cloud-based test management tool that provides its customers with an end-to-end system to meet testing and QA needs. It is described by the vendor as flexible but methodological, enabling organizations to ensure visibility and communication at all levels. The solution aims to help users and project development teams streamline and manage their testing processes, while providing management with a clear and simple view of their project status at all times.
$39
user
Zephyr Enterprise
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Zephyr Enterprise provides optimization, quality, speed, and processing of testing activities in a single tool. Other features include creating test cases, defining user requirements and generating reports.N/A
Pricing
PractiTestZephyr Enterprise
Editions & Modules
Professional
$39.00
user
Enterprise
$49.00
user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PractiTestZephyr Enterprise
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact vendor for pricing information.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PractiTestZephyr Enterprise
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
PractiTestZephyr Enterprise
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
PractiTest
8.5
4 Ratings
6% above category average
Zephyr Enterprise
9.3
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Centralized test management9.24 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Map tests to user stories8.44 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Test execution reporting8.44 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Defect management8.03 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PractiTestZephyr Enterprise
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.4 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.4 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PractiTestZephyr Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(4 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
PractiTestZephyr Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
PractiTest
PractiTest works GREAT as a test case repository. It is very easy to gather metrics, filter, and sort based on custom fields. We were able to work with the API to pull our automation results in as well. The support team is always very quick with their responses and monitors the "in-app chat." They are very open to answering questions, providing best practice materials, and looking for additional feedback. If you already have a central location for all of your test cases and testing needs, then I guess you probably wouldn't need to add another. However, PractiTest has high capability and potential, so if it's set up properly you can easily save time managing your tests.
Read full review
SmartBear
  1. Well suited for companies having several applications which need rigorous continuous testing cycles due to periodic upgrades to products/features.
  2. Ideally suited for use cases where there is a need to run sanity and regression suites very frequently.
  3. It is very helpful to have a traceability matrix across Stories/tasks and easy to link all the test cases to be covered to stories.
  4. Variety of reports for Quality Dashboard.
Read full review
Pros
PractiTest
  • Effective Test case template.
  • Can integrate with different Atlassian products.
  • Report generation.
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Creation of Folders, Sub Folder and Releases for various Teams/Projects
  • Ability to create cycles and adding cases to these
  • Ability to copy/clone entire test cycles for regression/sanity needs
  • Linking of defects to Test Cases
Read full review
Cons
PractiTest
  • Linking the defect with Jira throws an error quite some times which can be improved in the future.
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Better Test case Upload Utility
  • Ability to quickly map test cases from excel to JIRA fields
Read full review
Support Rating
PractiTest
The chat button is available to anyone who logs into PractiTest. In my experience, the support has always been very quick, very friendly, and very thorough. They make sure that your question is answered in a way that you understand it. They also provide documentation of best practices so you are never left hanging on what to do next.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
PractiTest
I've used many different Test Case Repository tools, and while each of them has its perks, I like the capabilities of PractiTest best. When creating a test in qTest for example, you can only input information into the fields provided, and you have everything set up in a folder tree structure. With PractiTest, we are able to create custom fields and filter our tests based on those fields to provide more accurate information in a readily available format while quickly searching for the filter instead of through a folder tree. TestRail did not appear to meet our needs as a company. It just didn't have the potential that we found with PractiTest. Zephyr for example worked seamlessly with Jira, which is really nice since that is what we use for the most part. However since we cater to many different clients, we needed an external Test Case repository so we could use something that wasn't tied to 1 Jira instance.
Read full review
SmartBear
Read full review
Return on Investment
PractiTest
  • Test Reporting
  • Defect Management
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Time saving and productivity enhancement for QA teams by preventing context and tool switching
  • High observability to management via QA Dashboards
Read full review
ScreenShots

PractiTest Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of