ProGet vs. Pulp

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ProGet
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
inedo offers ProGet, a software repository and package management solution.N/A
Pulp
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Pulp is an open source platform for managing repositories of software packages and making them available to a large number of consumers. Pulp can locally mirror all or part of a repository, host software packages in repositories, and manage many types of content from multiple sources in one place. Pulp is a Red Hat Community Project.N/A
Pricing
ProGetPulp
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ProGetPulp
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ProGetPulp
Best Alternatives
ProGetPulp
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ProGetPulp
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ProGetPulp
Likelihood to Recommend
Inedo
As of current, the only artifactory management tool that I would recommend is ProGet. The free version is plentiful in features, supporting all feed types that the paid plans do. The paid plans also add even more capabilities on top of the free plan, such as data retention policies, which helps to minimize storage waste on my server and keep everything clean.
Read full review
Open Source
I understand that this tool may not be for everyone, but it served its purpose perfectly for us. It allows us to safely change to older repositories in case we need to roll back any changes. It has definitely reduced operational costs for us due to allowing us to safely manage our own packages without relying solely on external providers, which are not always reliable. However, it's worth mentioning that the setup/maintenance can be a little bit fiddly for some users. There's a learning curve here, but, to us, it was totally worth it.
Read full review
Pros
Inedo
  • The Docker registry feature works great. Compared to Sonatype Nexus 3, I don't need to set up extra ports, as everything just works off the port ProGet itself is running on.
  • Debian feeds support automatic GPG key generation, without me having to create or manage them myself. This is another spot where ProGet is better than Nexus, as you have to manually create and specify a key with Nexus, while ProGet simply handles it all for you.
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Cons
Inedo
  • When running ProGet inside of a Docker container, changes to some settings requires a manual restart of the container (i.e. with 'docker restart x').
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Inedo
Both Sonatype Nexus 3 and ProGet support all the feed types I use, but ProGet simply does them better. The Docker feeds run on the same port as ProGet itself, while Nexus requires additional ports to be set up, which can be a burden when running in Docker. Debian feeds also support GPG key creation without having to manually specify one, again, reducing the burden for me to manually do things, allowing me to set up and distribute my programs even quicker.
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Inedo
  • I don't need to develop custom solutions for distributing my software, as ProGet does it all for me.
  • ProGet also integrates easily into my CI systems, with a fully-featured API that allows me to upload packages right after building.
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots