Progress Corticon Business Rules Engine vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Progress Corticon BRE
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Progress Software, headquartered in Bedford, Massachusetts, offers the Progress Corticon Business Rules Engine (BRE), a business rules management option.N/A
Red Hat JBoss EAP
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
Progress Corticon Business Rules EngineRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Progress Corticon BRERed Hat JBoss EAP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Progress Corticon Business Rules EngineRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Features
Progress Corticon Business Rules EngineRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Progress Corticon Business Rules Engine
-
Ratings
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
8.6
8 Ratings
7% above category average
IDE support00 Ratings8.18 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings8.68 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings8.18 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings8.68 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings9.58 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings8.68 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Progress Corticon Business Rules EngineRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Score 9.6 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Score 9.6 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Progress Corticon Business Rules EngineRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.1
(8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(3 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.2
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Progress Corticon Business Rules EngineRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Progress Software Corporation
Suited for any place where complex business rules need to be separated for ease of flexibility.
Read full review
Red Hat
JBoss EAP is subscription based/open source platform. It's very reliable and great for deploying high transaction Java based enterprise applications. It integrates well with third party components like mod_cluster and supports popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit.
Read full review
Pros
Progress Software Corporation
  • Handle complex business rules.
  • Test different scenarios after changes have been made.
  • Allow for version control and auditing of queries and responses.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments.
  • Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc.
  • Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments.
Read full review
Cons
Progress Software Corporation
  • The UI could be made more appealing.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Jboss CLI is a great tool but we had trouble using it to get values that are displayed on Jboss GUI. It also has limitations parsing the applications.xml files and we had to use a mix of jboss-cli and linux bash commands to automate certain application administrative tasks.
  • JBoss doesn't really provides performance tuning recommendations. It would have been nice if it could learn from the current demand vs current settings for things like connection pool, server configurations, garbage collection etc.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Progress Software Corporation
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop
Read full review
Usability
Progress Software Corporation
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available.
Read full review
Performance
Progress Software Corporation
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Usually, Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is good at performance and well suited for high traffic Java EE-based applications, but we have faced hard times performance tuning it for our specific needs. The product would be nicer if they would add a performance diagnostic and recommendations feature to it.
Read full review
Support Rating
Progress Software Corporation
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Fast response.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Progress Software Corporation
Corticon is way easier and allows for testing.
Read full review
Red Hat
We selected JBoss because of compatibility with EJB's. We currently are trying to reduce our footprint and will highly consider using Tomcat.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Progress Software Corporation
  • It has definitely had a positive ROI. Instead of having developers try to figure out these complex rules and how to code them in a flexible way, we now have business analysts using Corticon.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Improved delivery timelines due to easy out of the box setup.
  • It is a cheap subscription-based/open-source Java EE-based application server. This reduces the overall cost of delivery.
Read full review
ScreenShots