Proxmox VE vs. Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Proxmox VE
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Proxmox Virtual Environment is an open source server virtualization management solution based on QEMU/KVM and LXC. Users can manage virtual machines, containers, highly available clusters, storage and networks via a web interface or CLI. Proxmox VE code is licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License, version 3. The project is developed and maintained by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH.
$90
year & CPU socket
Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Score 6.1 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat Virtualization (formerly Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, broadly known as RHEV) is an enterprise level server and desktop virtualization solution. Red Hat Virtualization also contains the functionality of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization for Desktop in later editions of the platform.
$999
Per Year Per Hypervisor
Pricing
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
Community
€ 90
year & CPU socket
Basic
€ 280
year & CPU socket
Standard
€ 420
year & CPU socket
Premium
€ 840
year & CPU socket
Standard
$999.00
Per Year Per Hypervisor
Premium
$1,499.00
Per Year Per Hypervisor
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsProxmox Virtual Environment's source code is published under the free software license GNU AGPL, v3 and thus is freely available for download, use and share. A Proxmox VE Subscription is an additional service program that helps IT professionals and businesses keep Proxmox VE deployments up-to-date. A subscription provides access to the stable Proxmox VE Enterprise Repository delivering software updates and security enhancements, technical help and support.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Considered Both Products
Proxmox VE
Chose Proxmox VE
Proxmox is somewhat more flexible (for being a Linux distro) than VMware. VMWare's network configuration is more robust and well implemented, but it lacks lots of resources that Proxmox has, like ZFS for example. Overall I think both solutions offer good tools and the best …
Chose Proxmox VE
Proxmox Virtual Environment is better, less costly, it has better CAPEX and OPEX, is open source and more robust and flexible.
It is an agnostic product, one can use a PC clone or a high end server to install it, and it works flawlessly on both.
The product has a large life …
Chose Proxmox VE
Based on my experience , I selected Proxmox VE because it offers a range of powerful features and functionalities at a lower cost than proprietary platforms such as VMware ESXi and Citrix Hypervisor. Additionally, Proxmox VE is an open-source platform, which means that users …
Chose Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE is cheaper than VMware, especially upscaling an HA architecture. Compared with other free or less expensive solutions, Proxmox VE is high compatible with more types of hardware solutions and more VM types. From my point of view, Proxmox VE has no competitor at the …
Chose Proxmox VE
Proxmox emulates hardware exceptionally well. This makes migration easier between systems. Additionally, the licensing model is friendly and the system is quite featureful. On top of that, by having a common base (Debian Linux) we have access to tools without needing to jump …
Chose Proxmox VE
well previously we try to find the fast and lite virtualization platform, we try VMware, we try Citrix, but finally we decided to use Proxmox because it suitable for the development software team, fast provision and delete VM, save a lot of time for DevOps Team.
Chose Proxmox VE
With an incredibly easy to use interface, quick setup, and wide support for different hardware we found it was the perfect lab tool for our department to build, stage, and eventually move VMs into production with.
Chose Proxmox VE
We've used VirtualBox on desktop systems. It's great for what it is, but it's a whole different ballgame to Proxmox VE. Proxmox provides the virtualisation, like VirtualBox, but on top of that you get a very well oiled management layer, storage integration, clustering, etc.

Chose Proxmox VE
I have tried VMWare ESXi, as that was free, but then quickly found out that for cluster I needed the paid version.
Hyper-V server was also tried but did not have an easy high available cluster install without creating a separate domain.
XenServer was a great free alternative, but …
Chose Proxmox VE
VMWare pricing is steep when compared to the Proxmox VE licensing model. You can use Proxmox VE GPL for free to fully evaluate every aspect of it. VMWare also requires you to install software on your virtual machine instances to which you wouldn't normally need. Proxmox VE just …
Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Red Hat Virtualization is the best enterprise-level virtualization software for an organization that needs cost-effective and flexible solutions for its environment. We can easily integrate RHEV with other Red Hat software like OpenStack...etc. RHEV is highly customizable …
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
RHV has the following advantages:
  • They have relatively cheaper subscriptions compared to others.
  • With the future going to Openstack and containerization migrating to KVM-based virtualization will be easier to migrate to future products.
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Compared to oVirt, RHEV is more stable but has fewer capabilities. ESX is far more difficult to automate.
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
  • Red Hat Enterprise is more expensive but better supported when it comes to support.
  • Amazon WorkSpaces had more online documentation and resources to scan through.
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
RHEV is an excellent product, includes more features, is less expensive, and has rock solid reliability and is backed with the best Red Hat Support in the industry. RHEV uses KVM under the hood which is used by all the big players in the industry (AWS, Rackspace, etc) to lower …
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
RHEV offers a decent GUI and many management features, such as an API.
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
We use them both, as one is not better than the other at all facets required. There is still a need to use both products, as we have not fully switched to RHEV due to Vsphere still having an edge over them with edits available to the systems while they are operational or they …
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
VMware ESXi is a more mature technology, as it has been around for a longer period of time. However, automating ESXi installations requires hacking OEM media and an intense amount of knowledge of how ESXi operates under the hood. The WebUI and associated functionality for ESXi …
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Pretty much Open Source sums it up.
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
RHEV is more stable than ovirt but less capability. Much easier to automate than esx
TrustRadius Insights
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Highlights

TrustRadius
Research Team Insight
Published

Proxmox VE and Red Hat Virtualization (RHV) are open-source, Linux-based server virtualization systems. Proxmox VE is offered for free, making it a popular choice for do-it-yourself IT professionals. Red Hat Virtualization, though not free, comes with a lower price tag compared to traditional closed-source virtualization solutions, and includes more enterprise features and professional support. Red Hat Virtualization is almost equally popular with mid-size companies and large enterprises, probably due to its combination of open-source ideals with a  budget-friendly price tag. Proxmox VE is mostly popular with mid-size companies who likely have smaller-scale IT needs that can still be easily met with free software.

Features

Both Red Hat Virtualization and Proxmox VE help businesses manage virtual assets, but they have a few key differences to consider.

Red Hat Virtualization is designed to be easy to implement, even if you have an existing virtualization management solution. Red Hat Virtualization offers migration scripts and assistance to help new customers get up and running quickly and smoothly. The company also offers professional support after setup to make sure their customers can solve any issues that may arise, and many customers specifically praise the quality of Red Hat Virtualization’s support team. For a professionally-supported, paid solution, Red Hat Virtualization still has a low price point when compared to industry standards such as VMWare.

However, Red Hat Virtualization can’t beat Proxmox VE’s price tag: free. For businesses who want extra assistance, Proxmox VE also offers a paid support subscription to help with technical problems and upgrades. This pay-if-you-need flexibility is extremely helpful for cost-conscious IT departments. The fact that the software is free also makes Proxmox VE scale-friendly, with no need to buy additional licenses as your datacenter grows. Proxmox VE also offers high-availability features such as host-aware failover, allowing the system to move to another host if its current host crashes or runs too hot.

Limitations

Despite their strong feature set, both Proxmox VE and Red Hat Virtualization have their drawbacks.

Some users may find that Proxmox VE is missing features they need, such as the ability to dynamically move hosts between hardware resources to balance out high usage. The management GUI is browser-based, which means that administrators must use console commands if they don’t have a network connection. Proxmox VE can also be cumbersome to upgrade and complicated to set up, especially for users without existing virtualization and Linux experience.

Red Hat Virtualization has a local UI, but users often complain that the UI is outdated and unintuitive. Although the company provides scripts to migrate virtual hosts from other platforms, these scripts might not be plug-and-play for all users, making the migration experience more of a hassle if, for instance, your disk names have spaces in them. With no live-patching options, maintenance for Red Hat Virtualization can also be a chore, requiring a reboot to upgrade the system.

Pricing

Proxmox VE is open-source and free, with an optional paid support and upgrade plan that uses a tiered per-year, per-CPU-socket structure. The Community tier is $100.05 per socket per year and gives access to the Proxmox update repository. The Basic tier is $317.91 per socket per year and adds access to a customer support portal and 3 support tickets per year. The Standard tier is $468.61 per socket per year and increases the support ticket limit to 10 per year, with a guaranteed first response time of 4 hours. The Premium tier is $937.23 per socket per year and offers unlimited support tickets and a guaranteed first response time of 2 hours. (All prices converted from Euro to USD.)

Pricing information for Red Hat Virtualization is available from Red Hat or a Red Hat sales partner.

Features
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Server Virtualization
Comparison of Server Virtualization features of Product A and Product B
Proxmox VE
7.2
Ratings
11% below category average
Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
7.7
Ratings
4% below category average
Virtual machine automated provisioning7.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Management console7.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Live virtual machine backup8.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Live virtual machine migration6.00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Hypervisor-level security8.00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Small Businesses
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.7 out of 10
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
Proxmox VE is a virtualization platform that provides a range of features and functionalities suitable for various scenarios. Here are some specific scenarios where Proxmox VE is well suited and some scenarios where it might not be the best choice:Well-suited scenarios:Virtualization of server workloads: Proxmox VE is well suited for virtualizing server workloads such as web servers, mail servers, database servers, and other similar applications. Its high-performance virtualization capabilities allow these workloads to run smoothly and efficiently.Hosting multiple virtual machines (VMs): Proxmox VE is ideal for hosting multiple VMs on a single server. It provides efficient resource management, allowing users to easily allocate resources to each VM.Clustered environments: Proxmox VE is a great choice for clustered environments. It supports clustering and can easily manage multiple servers, providing high availability and load balancing for mission-critical applications. Less appropriate scenarios: Limited hardware resources: Proxmox VE requires significant hardware resources to run efficiently. If you have limited hardware resources, it might not be the best choice. Simple applications: If you only need to run a single, simple application, Proxmox VE might be overkill. Other virtualization platforms or even a basic web hosting service might be more appropriate.
Read full review
Red Hat Virtualization is suitable for small implementation and hosting VMs. However, when you start asking for additional features or enhancements, the engineering team is not the flexible as other engineering teams in Red Hat. It is very likely they will not accept adding features or in the best case. They wouldn't commit to a plan when it is possible to be available.
Read full review
Pros
  • ZFS storage out of the box. The integration with ZFS is fantastic. You can easily create pools to store your VM images and data on, and the Proxmox web UI provides an easy way to check drive health, ZFS scrub status, etc.
  • Great web UI. Practically everything configurable is available to do so from the web user interface. You'll rarely need to drop to the command line for administrative tasks, unless you want to, in which case you can do that too. The UI also provides graphs and visualisations to help you keep check of how everything is performing.
  • Easy to setup a high availability cluster. Although Proxmox VE works perfectly well on a single server, you can also install it on multiple hosts and setup a cluster.
  • Uses a Debian core system with an Ubuntu based kernel. This means everything to do with the base operating system is tried and trusted. We use a lot of Debian and Ubuntu installs, so having this run underneath Proxmox VE was an added bonus for us.
Read full review
  • RHV issues/bugs can be reported via Bugzilla to RH support. The service is great and typically responds soon.
  • Red Hat distribution integration is seamless as it is integrated into the kernel.
  • OpenStack support enables more customized VM templates and network configuration control.
Read full review
Cons
  • The web UI does not work as well on mobile devices. It is useable, but a mobile optimised / responsive UI would be nice to have. There is a mobile app, so that may alleviate this issue, but I have not yet tried it.
  • Support in the community forums could be better. There are paid support plans, but new users trying out the software will not have access to this. Answers to questions can sometimes be terse, and I can imagine this may put some people off.
  • The wiki is a bit hit and miss with certain topics. I've often seen outdated or missing information, and the whole thing looks like it could do with some polish. I'd love to see it opened up for the community to add to.
Read full review
  • Documentation of RHEV needs more improvement.
  • RHEV GUI needs a lot of improvements in some versions of RHEV, GUI will not work properly (shows incorrect details of VM ).
  • Need fast rollout of patch releases.
  • Need good linux Knowledge to manage the RHEVM.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Proxmox VE provides the most capable, yet stable virtualization platform in the market today. Licensing options are also competitive and cost-effective for support, and support is extremely fast and knowledgable of getting issues resolved as quickly and soundly as possible.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The interface is easy to use for most of it, but still lacks screens for some configurations. Also, a few of the screens are not as intuitive as they could be. This is specially true with disk and network configuration, where some graphic/visual representations of the configurations would be very useful
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Proxmox VE's ha-cluster functionality is very much improved, though does have a not-very-often occurrence of failure. In a 2-node cluster of Proxmox VE, HA can fail causing an instance that is supposed to migrate between the two nodes stop and fail until manually recovered through the command-line tools provided. Other than this, the HA clustering capability of Proxmox VE has proven to be reliable in 3 or more clustered environments with much less chance of these failures to occur.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Proxmox VE's interfacing is always fast to load, both the Web interface and the command-line tool interfaces. Reporting is practically real time almost all the time, and you can see everything in mere seconds, easily able to identify if something is wrong or it everything is in tip-top shape as always desired
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
They are fast, understanding, very intelligent, know their product very well, fast, responsive, and concise. Need I say more?
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
It worked, was easy and super fast to deploy, and provided everything we needed in a matter of minutes
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Proxmox Virtual Environment is better, less costly, it has better CAPEX and OPEX, is open source and more robust and flexible.
It is an agnostic product, one can use a PC clone or a high end server to install it, and it works flawlessly on both.
The product has a large life cycle, is stable and has few problems and vulnerabilities than the other propietary products.
Read full review
Red Hat Virtualization is the best enterprise-level virtualization software for an organization that needs cost-effective and flexible solutions for its environment. We can easily integrate RHEV with other Red Hat software like OpenStack...etc. RHEV is highly customizable software, which helps us to customize our environment. Since RHEV is an open-source tool, we can install it on any hardware. There is no proprietary dependency.
Read full review
Scalability
Proxmox VE provides everything you need to quickly add new storage mediums, network and local, as well as networking interfaces, such as using Linux standard bridges and now Open-vSwitch bridges which can be even more scalable than before. Proxmox VE 4.0 dropped support for OpenVZ in favor of the more well supported and native LXC and made an upgrade path to it very simple.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Due to the open source nature of Proxmox, we have no licensing costs while training our employees
  • We've migrated 100% of our clients to Proxmox and have found improved uptime, and flexibility.
  • In the 10 years of using Proxmox, we've yet to lose any data or not be notified of backup issues.
Read full review
  • It has had an extremely positive impact on my overall business and has allowed me to utilize and leverage it as an offering to my clients.
  • It's an extremely solid, robust, and reliable product built off of KVM Virtualization technology.
  • Less expensive solution than VMware and includes more features!
Read full review
ScreenShots