Proxmox VE vs. Red Hat Virtualization

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Proxmox VE
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Proxmox Virtual Environment is an open source server virtualization management solution based on QEMU/KVM and LXC. Users can manage virtual machines, containers, highly available clusters, storage and networks via a web interface or CLI. Proxmox VE code is licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License, version 3. The project is developed and maintained by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH.
$7.50
per month
Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat Virtualization (formerly Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, broadly known as RHEV) is an enterprise level server and desktop virtualization solution. Red Hat Virtualization also contains the functionality of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization for Desktop in later editions of the platform.
$999
Per Year Per Hypervisor
Pricing
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization
Editions & Modules
Community
€ 90
year & CPU socket
Basic
€ 280
year & CPU socket
Standard
€ 420
year & CPU socket
Premium
€ 840
year & CPU socket
Standard
$999.00
Per Year Per Hypervisor
Premium
$1,499.00
Per Year Per Hypervisor
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization (RHV)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsProxmox Virtual Environment's source code is published under the free software license GNU AGPL, v3 and thus is freely available for download, use and share. A Proxmox VE Subscription is an additional service program that helps IT professionals and businesses keep Proxmox VE deployments up-to-date. A subscription provides access to the stable Proxmox VE Enterprise Repository delivering software updates and security enhancements, technical help and support.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization
Considered Both Products
Proxmox VE
Chose Proxmox VE
With an incredibly easy to use interface, quick setup, and wide support for different hardware we found it was the perfect lab tool for our department to build, stage, and eventually move VMs into production with.
Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)

No answer on this topic

Top Pros
Top Cons
TrustRadius Insights
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization
Highlights

TrustRadius
Research Team Insight
Published

Proxmox VE and Red Hat Virtualization (RHV) are open-source, Linux-based server virtualization systems. Proxmox VE is offered for free, making it a popular choice for do-it-yourself IT professionals. Red Hat Virtualization, though not free, comes with a lower price tag compared to traditional closed-source virtualization solutions, and includes more enterprise features and professional support. Red Hat Virtualization is almost equally popular with mid-size companies and large enterprises, probably due to its combination of open-source ideals with a  budget-friendly price tag. Proxmox VE is mostly popular with mid-size companies who likely have smaller-scale IT needs that can still be easily met with free software.

Features

Both Red Hat Virtualization and Proxmox VE help businesses manage virtual assets, but they have a few key differences to consider.

Red Hat Virtualization is designed to be easy to implement, even if you have an existing virtualization management solution. Red Hat Virtualization offers migration scripts and assistance to help new customers get up and running quickly and smoothly. The company also offers professional support after setup to make sure their customers can solve any issues that may arise, and many customers specifically praise the quality of Red Hat Virtualization’s support team. For a professionally-supported, paid solution, Red Hat Virtualization still has a low price point when compared to industry standards such as VMWare.

However, Red Hat Virtualization can’t beat Proxmox VE’s price tag: free. For businesses who want extra assistance, Proxmox VE also offers a paid support subscription to help with technical problems and upgrades. This pay-if-you-need flexibility is extremely helpful for cost-conscious IT departments. The fact that the software is free also makes Proxmox VE scale-friendly, with no need to buy additional licenses as your datacenter grows. Proxmox VE also offers high-availability features such as host-aware failover, allowing the system to move to another host if its current host crashes or runs too hot.

Limitations

Despite their strong feature set, both Proxmox VE and Red Hat Virtualization have their drawbacks.

Some users may find that Proxmox VE is missing features they need, such as the ability to dynamically move hosts between hardware resources to balance out high usage. The management GUI is browser-based, which means that administrators must use console commands if they don’t have a network connection. Proxmox VE can also be cumbersome to upgrade and complicated to set up, especially for users without existing virtualization and Linux experience.

Red Hat Virtualization has a local UI, but users often complain that the UI is outdated and unintuitive. Although the company provides scripts to migrate virtual hosts from other platforms, these scripts might not be plug-and-play for all users, making the migration experience more of a hassle if, for instance, your disk names have spaces in them. With no live-patching options, maintenance for Red Hat Virtualization can also be a chore, requiring a reboot to upgrade the system.

Pricing

Proxmox VE is open-source and free, with an optional paid support and upgrade plan that uses a tiered per-year, per-CPU-socket structure. The Community tier is $100.05 per socket per year and gives access to the Proxmox update repository. The Basic tier is $317.91 per socket per year and adds access to a customer support portal and 3 support tickets per year. The Standard tier is $468.61 per socket per year and increases the support ticket limit to 10 per year, with a guaranteed first response time of 4 hours. The Premium tier is $937.23 per socket per year and offers unlimited support tickets and a guaranteed first response time of 2 hours. (All prices converted from Euro to USD.)

Pricing information for Red Hat Virtualization is available from Red Hat or a Red Hat sales partner.

Features
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization
Server Virtualization
Comparison of Server Virtualization features of Product A and Product B
Proxmox VE
8.6
9 Ratings
3% above category average
Red Hat Virtualization
7.7
10 Ratings
8% below category average
Virtual machine automated provisioning8.39 Ratings8.010 Ratings
Management console8.89 Ratings7.310 Ratings
Live virtual machine backup9.09 Ratings7.39 Ratings
Live virtual machine migration8.89 Ratings7.010 Ratings
Hypervisor-level security7.78 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization
Small Businesses
Oracle VM VirtualBox
Oracle VM VirtualBox
Score 8.9 out of 10
Oracle VM VirtualBox
Oracle VM VirtualBox
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
vSphere with Operations Management (discontinued)
vSphere with Operations Management (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
vSphere with Operations Management (discontinued)
vSphere with Operations Management (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
vSphere with Operations Management (discontinued)
vSphere with Operations Management (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
vSphere with Operations Management (discontinued)
vSphere with Operations Management (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(9 ratings)
6.7
(12 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Proxmox VERed Hat Virtualization
Likelihood to Recommend
Proxmox Server Solutions
Proxmox VE is a virtualization platform that provides a range of features and functionalities suitable for various scenarios. Here are some specific scenarios where Proxmox VE is well suited and some scenarios where it might not be the best choice:Well-suited scenarios:Virtualization of server workloads: Proxmox VE is well suited for virtualizing server workloads such as web servers, mail servers, database servers, and other similar applications. Its high-performance virtualization capabilities allow these workloads to run smoothly and efficiently.Hosting multiple virtual machines (VMs): Proxmox VE is ideal for hosting multiple VMs on a single server. It provides efficient resource management, allowing users to easily allocate resources to each VM.Clustered environments: Proxmox VE is a great choice for clustered environments. It supports clustering and can easily manage multiple servers, providing high availability and load balancing for mission-critical applications. Less appropriate scenarios: Limited hardware resources: Proxmox VE requires significant hardware resources to run efficiently. If you have limited hardware resources, it might not be the best choice. Simple applications: If you only need to run a single, simple application, Proxmox VE might be overkill. Other virtualization platforms or even a basic web hosting service might be more appropriate.
Read full review
Red Hat
RHEV is well suited for organizations that need a cost-effective and flexible solution for their environment. As its vendor-independent software, easily install on any type of hardware. RHEV provides a GUI interface to manage the software, which makes the management of the software easier for the end-user. RHEV is best for non-production or less critical applications. RHEV can be easily integrated with other REDHAT software.
Read full review
Pros
Proxmox Server Solutions
  • Live Migration of VM on different nodes.
  • HA architecture without SPOF, multi master and Watchdog based Fencing.
  • Programmable Backup and restore.
  • Terraform provider plugin for Proxmox VE.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • RHV issues/bugs can be reported via Bugzilla to RH support. The service is great and typically responds soon.
  • Red Hat distribution integration is seamless as it is integrated into the kernel.
  • OpenStack support enables more customized VM templates and network configuration control.
Read full review
Cons
Proxmox Server Solutions
  • Can't manage ZFS replication or snapshots as easily as I'd like
  • Encrypted disks aren't easily deployed in VMs
  • Moving disks between VMs is not automated
Read full review
Red Hat
  • 1- RHVM API is pretty slow, especially after creating a VM it is not possible to retrieve the VM details (i.e VM's MAC Address) fast enough, where we need to place a pause in our Ansible Playbook, make the automation process slow.
  • 2- RHV is still using collected to monitor the hypervisors which is deviating from Red Hat policy for other RHEL based applications to use PCP to monitor, which is richer in features.
  • 3- It will be great if it is possible to patch the hypervisors using other tools such as satellite and not only via RHVM.
  • 4- In the past Red Hat used to present patches in the z release (i.e. 4.3.z), and features in the y release (i.e 4. y), but starting from 4.4 that is mixed together wherein the Z release you get both patches and features, that is not good because that requires a lot of time to test when we patch as it includes features as well.
  • 5- Engineering team has to be more reactive when new feature is requested.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Proxmox Server Solutions
Proxmox VE provides the most capable, yet stable virtualization platform in the market today. Licensing options are also competitive and cost-effective for support, and support is extremely fast and knowledgable of getting issues resolved as quickly and soundly as possible.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Usability
Proxmox Server Solutions
Out of every product I have used for this, Proxmox VE is the most concise, clear, and functional I have ever seen. I continue to use Proxmox VE even after occasionally comparing alternatives available because of it's usability, design concept, and great support of features. It's very unlikely I will find a product that can even compete with Proxmox VE in every angle of what Proxmox VE provides.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Proxmox Server Solutions
Proxmox VE's ha-cluster functionality is very much improved, though does have a not-very-often occurrence of failure. In a 2-node cluster of Proxmox VE, HA can fail causing an instance that is supposed to migrate between the two nodes stop and fail until manually recovered through the command-line tools provided. Other than this, the HA clustering capability of Proxmox VE has proven to be reliable in 3 or more clustered environments with much less chance of these failures to occur.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Performance
Proxmox Server Solutions
Proxmox VE's interfacing is always fast to load, both the Web interface and the command-line tool interfaces. Reporting is practically real time almost all the time, and you can see everything in mere seconds, easily able to identify if something is wrong or it everything is in tip-top shape as always desired
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Proxmox Server Solutions
They are fast, understanding, very intelligent, know their product very well, fast, responsive, and concise. Need I say more?
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Proxmox Server Solutions
It worked, was easy and super fast to deploy, and provided everything we needed in a matter of minutes
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Proxmox Server Solutions
We've used VirtualBox on desktop systems. It's great for what it is, but it's a whole different ballgame to Proxmox VE. Proxmox provides the virtualisation, like VirtualBox, but on top of that you get a very well oiled management layer, storage integration, clustering, etc.
Prior to Proxmox VE, we did use some instances of basic KVM virtualisation. This is the same virtualisation technology as used under the hood by Proxmox, but without any of the integrations, management tools, and so on, that Proxmox provides. Moving from direct use of KVM, to Proxmox, was like night and day. Proxmox just makes it all very easy and so far, very reliable!
Read full review
Red Hat
RHEV is an excellent product, includes more features, is less expensive, and has rock solid reliability and is backed with the best Red Hat Support in the industry. RHEV uses KVM under the hood which is used by all the big players in the industry (AWS, Rackspace, etc) to lower their overall costs and improve efficiency and profits and that's why RHEV is an excellent solution!
Read full review
Scalability
Proxmox Server Solutions
Proxmox VE provides everything you need to quickly add new storage mediums, network and local, as well as networking interfaces, such as using Linux standard bridges and now Open-vSwitch bridges which can be even more scalable than before. Proxmox VE 4.0 dropped support for OpenVZ in favor of the more well supported and native LXC and made an upgrade path to it very simple.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Proxmox Server Solutions
  • using Proxmox you pay less and you gain more
  • the amount you paid for data center is around 1% of your revenue only
  • for non-profit i recommend using Proxmox for data center.
  • Proxmox IT support from low end hardware to high spec hardware.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • RHEV has provided a positive ROI as our customers are not experiencing as many outages during maintenances.
  • We have not experienced any catastrophic failures as a result of vsphere losing connection to the ntp.
  • There has been a level of stability in our environment that was not previously experienced with our previous vendor.
Read full review
ScreenShots