Quality Compliance Systems vs. SAP Process Control vs. Thoropass

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Quality Compliance Systems
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Quality Compliance Systems provides Care Quality Commission (CQC) compliance management software for dentists, doctors, and adult social care providers. It is a SaaS application. It includes over 2,000 pages of policies and procedures written by subject matter experts; as well as protocols, care plans and supporting documentation. Printed manuals are also available.N/A
SAP Process Control
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
SAP Process Control Simplifies uses continuous control monitoring, and streamlined testing, and reduces risk with real-time insight into control status and key issues. It can be deployed on premise or in the cloud.N/A
Thoropass
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Thoropass is a central platform for building and automating an organization's infosec compliance program. It is used to implement controls, manage audits, respond to security questionnaires, and ensure continuous compliance.N/A
Pricing
Quality Compliance SystemsSAP Process ControlThoropass
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Quality Compliance SystemsSAP Process ControlThoropass
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Quality Compliance SystemsSAP Process ControlThoropass
Considered Multiple Products
Quality Compliance Systems

No answer on this topic

SAP Process Control
Chose SAP Process Control
The connectivity with other SAP products out of the SAP GRC suite, like Access Control and so on, was key for the decision. Also we had an already mature SAP System landscape as well as having internal processes that were similar to the SAP Process Control standard processes …
Chose SAP Process Control
The strongest area is the native capability to connect to SAP applications to extract and analyze configuration and transactional data. AuditBoard and ServiceNow have better reporting/dashboard capabilities which offer better user experience. In addition, out of the box SAP …
Chose SAP Process Control
SAP Process Control is more integrated into SAP products which reduces customization, unlike other products like access violation management from greenlight. Other products like sailpoint are available in products to monitor similar functionality but are to be more customized …
Thoropass

No answer on this topic

Features
Quality Compliance SystemsSAP Process ControlThoropass
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Quality Compliance Systems
-
Ratings
SAP Process Control
7.0
Ratings
6% below category average
Thoropass
-
Ratings
Common repository of GRC items00 Ratings9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk management00 Ratings6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems00 Ratings5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
GRC policy management00 Ratings7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident management00 Ratings6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Quality Compliance SystemsSAP Process ControlThoropass
Small Businesses
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.3 out of 10
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.3 out of 10
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Quality Compliance SystemsSAP Process ControlThoropass
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Quality Compliance SystemsSAP Process ControlThoropass
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
SAP Process Control is well suited for managing the end to end lifecycle of controls across different regulations. When managing a risk and controls framework it is better suited for public companies that have regulation requirements. The tool does not offer good capabilities for managing robust IT regulations. It would be good if there's improvement to the tool so it can be used to manage IT assets.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Workflows - The workflows of SAP Process Control are extremely helpful
  • Reporting - Standard reports as well as the connection to SAP AC is very helpful
  • Continuous Control Monitoring is the way to go in ICS Topics in the future.
  • Handling of users - Assignment and Replacements
  • Spot Checks - Helpful workflows and setup
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Integrated attachments functionality (i.e., edit Word/Excel documents within SAP PC, rather than having to download the files locally)
  • More flexible dashboarding capabilities
  • Better out of the box reporting
  • No out of the box content for Controls, Regulations
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
The connectivity with other SAP products out of the SAP GRC suite, like Access Control and so on, was key for the decision. Also we had an already mature SAP System landscape as well as having internal processes that were similar to the SAP Process Control standard processes helped us with the decision to implement SAP Process Control.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Significant control on risks
  • Significant savings on audit testing can be achieved
  • Automation of risk management has a lot of audit standardization and confidence in compliance
  • Reliability of automated controls reduces time vested in testing the standard controls
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots