Qualys VMDR vs. Tenable Attack Surface Management
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Qualys VMDR | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | Qualys VMDR 2.0 with TruRisk gives enterprises visibility and insight into cyber risk exposure with the goal of making it easy to prioritize vulnerabilities, assets, or groups of assets based on business risk. Security teams can take action to mitigate risk, helping the business measure its true risk, and track risk reduction over time. | N/A |
Tenable Attack Surface Management | Score6.1 out of 10 | N/A | Tenable Attack Surface Management (formerly Tenable.asm, and previously Bit Discovery) is an external attack surface management (EASM) solution that integrates into a vulnerability management platform. Tenable.asm continuously maps the entire internet and discovers connections to internet-facing assets so that users can assess the security posture of the entire external attack surface, or those facets of an organization that face the public, and the Internet. It can be used to access an attack… | N/A |
| Qualys VMDR | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Qualys VMDR | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
86% Would buy again 6 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Qualys VMDR | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Qualys VMDR | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Qualys VMDR | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.6 | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 8.4 | - |
| Availability | 10.0 | - |
| Performance | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | 10.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 9.0 | - |
| Configurability | 9.0 | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 9.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 9.0 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 8.0 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 8.0 | - |
| Qualys VMDR | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |


