TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AVEVA Work Tasks

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AAVEVA Work Tasks (formerly Wonderware Skelta) provides digital transformation of operational processes with a business process and advanced workflow management system, designed to enable better collaboration between people and automation systems. Consistency and automation of electronic workflows with detailed execution records offers significant operational efficiency improvement potential, and reduces the cost of compliance. The user can orchestrate processes across functional domains,…N/A

    quickBPM

    N/A
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    quickBPM is presented as a comprehensive LowCode Platform which enables organizations to Automate business processes quickly, comprehensively and cost-effectively.N/A
    Pricing
    AVEVA Work TasksquickBPM
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AVEVA Work TasksquickBPM
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    AVEVA Work TasksquickBPM
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of AVEVA Work Tasks and quickBPM
    Feature
    AVEVA Work Tasks
    2.3
    1 Ratings
    108% below category average
    quickBPM
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Process Engine
    Comparison of Process Engine features of AVEVA Work Tasks and quickBPM
    Feature
    AVEVA Work Tasks
    6.9
    1 Ratings
    19% below category average
    quickBPM
    -
    Ratings
    Process designer8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Process simulation6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Business rules engine7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    SOA support8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for modeling languages3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Form builder8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Model execution8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content Management Capabilties
    Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of AVEVA Work Tasks and quickBPM
    Feature
    AVEVA Work Tasks
    5.0
    1 Ratings
    47% below category average
    quickBPM
    -
    Ratings
    Content management5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AVEVA Work TasksquickBPM
    Small Businesses
    Process Street
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Zoho Creator
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    TIBCO® BPM Enterprise
    Score8 out of 10
    AppSheet
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Business Automation Workflow
    Score10 out of 10
    Oracle APEX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AVEVA Work TasksquickBPM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AVEVA Work TasksquickBPM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    AVEVA
    Anything where form input is required, data presentation and custom interface screens, connected to a database or API backend. Also good at process orchestration, where tasks need to be allocated and completed as part of a workflow, it supports delegation and escalation. It does fit well tieing together other AVEVA products.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    quickBPM
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    AVEVA
    • Wysiwyg form editor
    • Desktop and mobile display
    • Extensibility with JavaScript and c#
    • Web API calls
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    quickBPM
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    AVEVA
    • Workflow editor user interface, a little clunky and has a learning curve
    • Permissions model is complex
    • Themes and corporate branding requires detailed css
    • Upgrades require very thorough testing of developed artefacts
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    quickBPM
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    AVEVA
    The features and capability is very good, but there is a learning curve to develop within it. It does take some effort to become proficient and build forms and workflows, however once deployed and running they are extremely reliable. The mobile application is quite good but best suited to be on an on-prem network rather than internet facing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    quickBPM
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    AVEVA
    Power Apps is good for microsoft, and basic forms, Work Tasks is more powerful. Other middleware is better for pure data integration but doesnt enable user interaction. There are some other options, Redhat has a similar product as well but it wasnt as mature when we were evaluating.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    quickBPM
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    AVEVA
    • We have built our entire EOM reconciliation process for production management, this is not possible without Work Tasks
    • We have complete standalone processes and applications built in Work Tasks, where complex steps and integrations are required. It is faster and cheaper than multiple bespoke products
    • The API integration has allowed us to tie applications together where user input is required and middleware doesnt quite work
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    quickBPM
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots