QuickESign vs. Scala

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
QuickESign
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$5
per month
Scala
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Scala in Malvern, PA offers their digital signage software which provides Designer for content design, Content Manager for content organization and control, and Player for content viewing. Notably the software supports a wide array of digital signage including touchscreen kiosks and service for direct customer engagement and interaction.N/A
Pricing
QuickESignScala
Editions & Modules
Light
$5
per month
Standard
$10
per month
Pro
$15
per month
Enterprise
$20
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
QuickESignScala
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing based on "Price Calculator" , versions and number of devices.—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
QuickESignScala
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

User Ratings
QuickESignScala
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
6.4
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
QuickESignScala
Likelihood to Recommend
QuickESign
If you need a solution that is so simple and easy to use and if you don't need any fancy/complex layouts then QuickESign is the best application for you. We can create various texts on our TVs using this application so easily that it literally takes seconds to publish the same. Also, the application is super easy to install and use.
Read full review
Scala
If you are in the data science world, Scala is the best language to work with Spark, the defacto data science data store. I think that is really the main likely reason I would ever recommend Scala. Another reason is if you already have a team of programmers familiar with functional programming, e.g. they all have years of Haskell experience. In that case, I definitely think Scala is a superior and faster-growing language than Haskell and that picking up Scala after Haskell should be quick.
Read full review
Pros
QuickESign
  • Easy to create notices
  • Easy to make announcements via TV
  • Keep our employees informed about the latest news in the company
  • Provide an outline to the newcomers in the firm
Read full review
Scala
  • Organizing different playlists.
  • Coordinating content schedule and running time.
Read full review
Cons
QuickESign
  • It's really hard to create custom animations
  • Only a set of predefined themes can be used and we cannot create any new ones
  • Difficult to update the signage at some points of time
Read full review
Scala
  • The built-in compiler, scalac, is sssssssssslllllooooowwwwww. I mean like, if you thought the Java compiler was slow, try Scala! The default compiler on my 12k line codebase takes 4 minutes to compile from scratch on my i7 quad-core machine. This can be mitigated through the paid solution of Hydra which compiles your code in parallel. Unfortunately, it's quite expensive and your legal department or finance department may not approve of it. But if they do, for me, it reduced my compile time down to 80 seconds, much more manageable.
  • Scala is not going anywhere and support for it is slowly dying. This is the main reason I would not choose Scala for my next company or project. Important Scala libraries such as secure social (which is used for OAuth, a major requirement of every web app) are hardly maintained. Another library that suffers from lack of updates is Slick, the database mapper. There aren't enough engineers working on it to even provide support for the new features that came out in Postgres 9.0 (e.g. JSONb). There is simply not enough of a community to drive Scala forward and keep 3rd party libraries up to date as Java world does it.
  • As a corollary of a stagnant community, hiring Scala developers is hard as well. Of the 30 backend engineers we've hired, only 3 came in already knowing Scala. And as I will mention below, this is a BIG problem because learning Scala is really tough.
  • The learning curve for Scala is very, very steep. Anecdotally, I came into my current company with strong Java experience. Java is the closest language to Scala but it took me 6 months before I stopped needing to pair program on easy tickets. It doesn't help that Scala has some weird syntax like Map[A, +B] and that it forces you to do functional programming.
Read full review
Support Rating
QuickESign
No answers on this topic
Scala
The customer service team is very responsive and usually returns calls or emails within a couple of hours of placing a request or inquiry. Just about every rep I've spoken to has been very thorough and helpful, walking me through each problem and explaining the solutions in a way that's easy to understand.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
QuickESign
QuickESign is super easy and it's affordable to use. We selected this product because it has a lot of popularity among other companies and they have given us good feedback. Almost all our needs in regards to E-signage can be done using QuickESign. Also, the widgets are really cool and easy to set up on any screen we like.
Read full review
Scala
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
QuickESign
  • We can now manage our employees and guests easily
  • Easy to pass information to the staff
  • There is no need for audio announcements
  • Shorter waiting time for staff appointments
Read full review
Scala
  • Negative: slow engineer onboarding. As I mentioned before, it took me 6 months to get up-to-speed on Scala and didn't need to bother more senior Scala engineers anymore for help with every ticket. That's hundreds of hours I wasted of myself and other engineer's time.
  • Positive: thread safety, no concurrency bug. The ROI on this one is really hard to calculate, but I do believe Scala has saved me hundreds of hours over the past few years by allowing me to never have to worry about deadlocks or race conditions. Scala is simply so safe we've never had race conditions within the JVM before.
  • Negative: third-party libraries aren't maintained so we have to fork and update them ourselves. As I mentioned before, we use Securesocial but it stopped receiving updates and there is simply no alternative to it. So, we forked it and put an engineer on it for a month to get it back up-to-date. What a waste of his time!
Read full review
ScreenShots